PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XONE vs. SHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XONE vs. SHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XONE achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than SHV's 1.58% return.


XONE

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.13%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.27%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
10Y*

SHV

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.68%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
2.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XONE vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XONE
BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
1.16%4.41%4.83%4.74%0.57%
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
1.58%4.21%5.12%5.04%0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XONE and SHV is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022

0.51

The correlation between XONE and SHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XONE vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XONE
XONE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
XONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XONE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XONE Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SHV
SHV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XONE vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XONESHVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-12.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-84.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.21

35.59

-32.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

22.71

141.48

-118.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

121.24

1,585.41

-1,464.17

XONE vs. SHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XONE Sharpe Ratio is 6.52, which is lower than the SHV Sharpe Ratio of 18.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XONE and SHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XONE vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XONE drawdown since its inception was -0.40%, smaller than the maximum SHV drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XONE and SHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XONESHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-0.45%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.16%

-0.03%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.28%

-0.03%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.01%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-0.03%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.00%

+0.03%

Volatility

XONE vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) has a higher volatility of 0.18% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.07%. This indicates that XONE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XONESHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

0.07%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.37%

0.13%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56%

0.21%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.86%

0.29%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.86%

0.28%

+0.58%

XONE vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XONE has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XONE vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison

XONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than SHV's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.83%4.09%5.02%4.73%1.39%0.00%0.74%2.19%1.66%0.72%0.34%0.03%
XONE
BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.06%4.33%5.21%4.46%1.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XONE and SHV have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XONE has higher volatility (0.18%) compared to SHV (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XONE dropped -0.40% vs SHV's -0.45%.

On 3-year performance, SHV leads with 4.60% vs 4.51% for XONE. On fees, XONE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SHV has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SHV has performed better with a 4.60% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XONE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SHV.

XONE has the higher dividend yield at 4.06%, compared with 3.83% for SHV.

XONE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 1 Year Target Duration Index, while SHV tracks ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for XONE and 0.15% for SHV.

SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.56 vs 6.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XONE and SHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer