XONE vs. LFAW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

XONE (BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and LFAW (LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. XONE is passively managed, while LFAW is actively managed. Over the past year, XONE returned 3.63% vs 3.42% for LFAW. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XONE charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LFAW.

Performance

XONE vs. LFAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) and LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF (LFAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XONE achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than LFAW's -0.85% return.

XONE

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.12%
• 6M: 1.30%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 1Y: 3.63%
• 3Y*: 4.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LFAW

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.76%
• 6M: -1.39%
• YTD: -0.85%
• 1Y: 3.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XONE vs. LFAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XONE BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	1.36%	4.41%	0.94%
LFAW LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF	-0.85%	6.00%	-9.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XONE and LFAW is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2024	0.51

The correlation between XONE and LFAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XONE vs. LFAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XONE

XONE Risk / Return Rank: 99
XONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
XONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
XONE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
XONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
XONE Martin Ratio Rank: 99

LFAW

LFAW Risk / Return Rank: 14
LFAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
LFAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
LFAW Omega Ratio Rank: 13
LFAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
LFAW Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XONE vs. LFAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) and LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF (LFAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XONE	LFAW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.39	0.32	+6.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	13.75	0.51	+13.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.15	1.06	+2.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	22.80	0.38	+22.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	118.44	0.94	+117.50

XONE vs. LFAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XONE Sharpe Ratio is 6.39, which is higher than the LFAW Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XONE and LFAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XONE vs. LFAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XONE drawdown since its inception was -0.40%, smaller than the maximum LFAW drawdown of -11.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XONE and LFAW.

Drawdown Indicators

	XONE	LFAW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.40%	-11.37%	+10.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.16%	-6.34%	+6.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-4.79%	+4.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.04%	-5.35%	+5.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	2.56%	-2.53%

Volatility

XONE vs. LFAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) is 0.22%, while LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF (LFAW) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that XONE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XONE	LFAW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.22%	2.34%	-2.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.39%	5.62%	-5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57%	7.49%	-6.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.85%	8.91%	-8.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.85%	8.91%	-8.06%

XONE vs. LFAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XONE has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than LFAW's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XONE vs. LFAW - Dividend Comparison

XONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than LFAW's 6.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LFAW LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF	6.47%	9.85%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%
XONE BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	4.02%	4.33%	5.21%	4.46%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XONE and LFAW in my portfolio?

XONE and LFAW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XONE or LFAW?

LFAW has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to XONE (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XONE dropped -0.40% vs LFAW's -11.37%.

Which ETF is better, XONE or LFAW?

On 1-year performance, XONE leads with 3.63% vs 3.42% for LFAW. On fees, XONE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XONE has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XONE or LFAW?

Over the 1-year period, XONE has performed better with a 3.63% return vs 3.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XONE or LFAW?

XONE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LFAW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XONE or LFAW?

LFAW has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 4.02% for XONE.

What is the main difference between XONE and LFAW?

They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Stone Ridge. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for XONE and 0.25% for LFAW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.39 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.