PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOM vs. TIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOM vs. TIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOM achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, XOM has outperformed TIP with an annualized return of 8.48%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.34% annualized return.


XOM

1D
1.03%
1M
-5.27%
6M
12.96%
YTD
16.96%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
22.21%
10Y*
8.48%

TIP

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.38%
6M
0.76%
YTD
1.00%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
2.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOM vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
16.96%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
1.00%6.77%1.65%3.80%-12.26%5.68%10.84%8.35%-1.42%2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between XOM and TIP is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2003

-0.08

The correlation between XOM and TIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.03 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOM vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOM vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.16

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.59

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.24

4.58

-1.34

XOM vs. TIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the TIP Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOM and TIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOM vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and TIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-14.57%

-47.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.11%

-1.98%

-18.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.11%

-4.54%

-15.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

-14.51%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.34%

-14.51%

-46.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.46%

-0.85%

-17.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-3.42%

-6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.65%

0.69%

+6.96%

Volatility

XOM vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison

Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 1.25%. This indicates that XOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.89%

1.25%

+6.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.76%

2.54%

+18.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.73%

3.47%

+21.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.71%

6.20%

+20.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.25%

5.73%

+22.52%

Dividends

XOM vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison

XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than TIP's 4.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
4.44%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.94%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOM and TIP have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOM has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to TIP (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOM dropped -62.40% vs TIP's -14.57%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOM and TIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer