PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOM vs. BINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOM vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOM achieves a 29.66% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 1.54% return.


XOM

1D
-0.71%
1M
12.31%
6M
8.56%
YTD
29.66%
1Y
47.96%
3Y*
16.58%
5Y*
26.47%
10Y*
10.50%
ALL TIME*
11.65%

BINC

1D
0.25%
1M
0.16%
6M
0.92%
YTD
1.54%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
6.82%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$71.10M$77.06M$122.56M
$2.23B$2.17B$2.45B

XOM vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
29.66%15.98%11.26%-3.09%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
1.54%7.57%5.76%7.12%

Correlation

The correlation between XOM and BINC is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023

-0.03

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between XOM and BINC has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.27, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOM vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

BINC
BINC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XOM vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMBINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.64

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.06

6.29

-0.23

XOM vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOM and BINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOM vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and BINC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMBINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-2.69%

-59.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.11%

-2.69%

-17.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.11%

-2.69%

-17.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.60%

-0.07%

-9.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-0.36%

-9.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.94%

0.70%

+7.24%

Volatility

XOM vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a higher volatility of 7.60% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 0.81%. This indicates that XOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMBINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.60%

0.81%

+6.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.60%

2.01%

+18.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.96%

2.36%

+22.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.64%

2.97%

+23.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.29%

2.97%

+25.32%

Dividends

XOM vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than BINC's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
5.86%5.86%6.14%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.65%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOM and BINC have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOM has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to BINC (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOM dropped -62.40% vs BINC's -2.69%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOM and BINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer