XNZS.L vs. PACW.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XNZS.L (Xtrackers World Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C) and PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) are both Global Equities funds - XNZS.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while PACW.L tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XNZS.L returned 25.45% vs 30.29% for PACW.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XNZS.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PACW.L.

Performance

XNZS.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers World Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZS.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNZS.L achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly lower than PACW.L's 11.92% return.

XNZS.L

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 8.86%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: 25.45%
• 3Y*: 15.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PACW.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 11.92%
• 6M: 12.31%
• 1Y: 30.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNZS.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XNZS.L Xtrackers World Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C	8.86%	7.78%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	11.92%	9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XNZS.L and PACW.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.97

The correlation between XNZS.L and PACW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XNZS.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNZS.L

XNZS.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
XNZS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XNZS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XNZS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
XNZS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
XNZS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

PACW.L

PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNZS.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers World Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZS.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XNZS.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.89	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	3.95	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.55	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	4.27	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.87	17.43	-4.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XNZS.L vs. PACW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNZS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the PACW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNZS.L and PACW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XNZS.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	2.89	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	1.24	-0.28

Drawdowns

XNZS.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNZS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.52%, roughly equal to the maximum PACW.L drawdown of -17.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNZS.L and PACW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNZS.L	PACW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.52%	-17.68%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.21%	-7.06%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-0.46%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-3.02%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.73%	+0.24%

Volatility

XNZS.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers World Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZS.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) have volatilities of 2.86% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNZS.L	PACW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	2.93%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.93%	7.75%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.69%	10.42%	+0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.38%	13.91%	-0.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.38%	13.91%	-0.53%

XNZS.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNZS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XNZS.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison

XNZS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.

Position	TTM
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	1.23%
XNZS.L Xtrackers World Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNZS.L and PACW.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, XNZS.L and PACW.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XNZS.L or PACW.L?

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNZS.L or PACW.L?

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XNZS.L.

What is the main difference between XNZS.L and PACW.L?

XNZS.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XNZS.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.