XNZN.DE vs. MIVA.DE
XNZN.DE (Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C) and MIVA.DE (Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - XNZN.DE tracks the MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR while MIVA.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNZN.DE returned 5.54%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for MIVA.DE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNZN.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for MIVA.DE.
Performance
XNZN.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNZN.DE achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than MIVA.DE's 5.31% return.
XNZN.DE
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 2.71%
- 1Y
- 1.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MIVA.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 5.31%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 6.51%
XNZN.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XNZN.DE Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C | 0.62% | 1.04% | 3.46% | 12.19% |
MIVA.DE Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF EUR (C) | 5.31% | 12.05% | 11.43% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNZN.DE and MIVA.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023 | 0.67 |
The correlation between XNZN.DE and MIVA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNZN.DE vs. MIVA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNZN.DE
MIVA.DE
XNZN.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE) and Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF EUR (C) (MIVA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNZN.DE | MIVA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.11 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | 0.75 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.29 | 1.96 | -1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNZN.DE | MIVA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | 0.60 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.53 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
XNZN.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNZN.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.90%, smaller than the maximum MIVA.DE drawdown of -30.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNZN.DE and MIVA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNZN.DE | MIVA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.90% | -30.57% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.08% | -6.94% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.90% | -11.02% | -12.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.13% | -3.21% | -5.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -5.64% | -1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 2.67% | +2.17% |
Volatility
XNZN.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF EUR (C) (MIVA.DE) at 3.14%. This indicates that XNZN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIVA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNZN.DE | MIVA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 3.14% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 7.19% | +4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 8.76% | +6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 10.96% | +5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 12.34% | +3.78% |
XNZN.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNZN.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MIVA.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XNZN.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNZN.DE nor MIVA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XNZN.DE and MIVA.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNZN.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNZN.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MIVA.DE.
XNZN.DE tracks MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR, while MIVA.DE tracks MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XNZN.DE and 0.23% for MIVA.DE.
Find the right allocation for XNZN.DE and MIVA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer