PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNIF.L vs. INDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNIF.L vs. INDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XNIF.L) and Nifty India Financials ETF (INDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XNIF.L is traded in GBp, while INDF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INDF values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XNIF.L

1D
1.22%
1M
-3.90%
YTD
-16.13%
6M
-16.53%
1Y
-14.54%
3Y*
-0.33%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
7.18%

INDF

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNIF.L vs. INDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XNIF.L
Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
-16.13%-1.71%6.70%11.98%5.08%23.10%13.40%
INDF
Nifty India Financials ETF
0.00%0.41%8.17%13.87%5.98%13.01%19.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XNIF.L and INDF is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2020

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between XNIF.L and INDF has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XNIF.L vs. INDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XNIF.L
INDF

Technology

22.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

19.7%

-

Communication Services

17.1%

-

Financial Services

11.0%
100.0%

Healthcare

11.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Energy

5.4%

-

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Industrials

2.3%

-

Utilities

0.9%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

XNIF.L
22.4%
INDF

-

Consumer Cyclical

XNIF.L
19.7%
INDF

-

Communication Services

XNIF.L
17.1%
INDF

-

Financial Services

XNIF.L
11.0%
INDF
100.0%

Healthcare

XNIF.L
11.0%
INDF

-

Consumer Defensive

XNIF.L
7.7%
INDF

-

Energy

XNIF.L
5.4%
INDF

-

Basic Materials

XNIF.L
2.6%
INDF

-

Industrials

XNIF.L
2.3%
INDF

-

Utilities

XNIF.L
0.9%
INDF

-

Real Estate

XNIF.L

-

INDF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNIF.L vs. INDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNIF.L
XNIF.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
XNIF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNIF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNIF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
XNIF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNIF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

INDF
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNIF.L vs. INDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XNIF.L) and Nifty India Financials ETF (INDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNIF.LINDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

XNIF.L vs. INDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNIF.LINDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

Drawdowns

XNIF.L vs. INDF - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNIF.LINDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.94%

Volatility

XNIF.L vs. INDF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNIF.LINDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.38%

XNIF.L vs. INDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNIF.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than INDF's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNIF.L vs. INDF - Dividend Comparison

XNIF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
INDF
Nifty India Financials ETF
21.29%21.29%6.15%8.84%3.12%1.58%
XNIF.L
Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XNIF.L and INDF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, INDF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INDF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XNIF.L.

XNIF.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while INDF is Financials Equities. XNIF.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while INDF tracks Nifty Financial Services 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XNIF.L and 0.75% for INDF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNIF.L and INDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer