PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNIF.L vs. FLXI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNIF.L vs. FLXI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XNIF.L) and Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XNIF.L is traded in GBp, while FLXI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLXI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNIF.L achieves a -13.58% return, which is significantly lower than FLXI.L's -8.46% return.


XNIF.L

1D
1.22%
1M
-1.22%
6M
-11.12%
YTD
-13.58%
1Y
-14.30%
3Y*
0.19%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
6.17%

FLXI.L

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.13%
6M
-6.99%
YTD
-8.46%
1Y
-9.90%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNIF.L vs. FLXI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XNIF.L
Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
-13.58%-1.71%6.70%11.98%5.08%23.10%7.50%-3.33%
FLXI.L
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-8.46%-4.41%12.69%15.93%2.62%26.08%9.74%-4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XNIF.L and FLXI.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2019

0.88

The correlation between XNIF.L and FLXI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNIF.L vs. FLXI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNIF.L
XNIF.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XNIF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNIF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNIF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XNIF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNIF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXI.L
FLXI.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FLXI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNIF.L vs. FLXI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XNIF.L) and Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XNIF.LFLXI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.91

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

-0.55

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

-1.11

-0.13

XNIF.L vs. FLXI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNIF.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the FLXI.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNIF.L and FLXI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNIF.L vs. FLXI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNIF.L drawdown since its inception was -78.21%, which is greater than FLXI.L's maximum drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNIF.L and FLXI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNIF.LFLXI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.21%

-38.48%

-39.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.09%

-18.09%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-22.31%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-22.31%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.79%

-17.00%

-4.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-7.36%

-26.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.52%

8.94%

+2.58%

Volatility

XNIF.L vs. FLXI.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XNIF.L) and Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXI.L) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNIF.LFLXI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

4.24%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

13.78%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

16.06%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.78%

16.25%

+4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.81%

20.50%

+1.31%

XNIF.L vs. FLXI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNIF.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXI.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNIF.L vs. FLXI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNIF.L nor FLXI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XNIF.L and FLXI.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXI.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXI.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XNIF.L.

XNIF.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while FLXI.L tracks FTSE India 30/18 Capped Index - Net Return. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XNIF.L and 0.19% for FLXI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNIF.L and FLXI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer