XNGS.L vs. XFSN.L
XNGS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) and XFSN.L (Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) are both Technology Equities funds from DWS tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNGS.L returned 27.39%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for XFSN.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XNGS.L vs. XFSN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNGS.L achieves a 17.59% return, which is significantly higher than XFSN.L's -2.90% return.
XNGS.L
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 12.71%
- YTD
- 17.59%
- 6M
- 15.55%
- 1Y
- 34.17%
- 3Y*
- 27.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XFSN.L
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- -2.90%
- 6M
- -4.80%
- 1Y
- -1.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNGS.L vs. XFSN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNGS.L Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C | 17.59% | 11.63% | 38.09% | 48.85% | -12.98% |
XFSN.L Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C | -2.90% | 2.93% | 34.89% | 21.37% | -7.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNGS.L and XFSN.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between XNGS.L and XFSN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNGS.L vs. XFSN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XNGS.L
XFSN.L
XNGS.L vs. XFSN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNGS.L | XFSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.00 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | -0.06 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.24 | -0.13 | +4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNGS.L | XFSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | -0.10 | +2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.61 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
XNGS.L vs. XFSN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNGS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, roughly equal to the maximum XFSN.L drawdown of -23.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNGS.L and XFSN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNGS.L | XFSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.85% | -23.96% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.19% | -23.96% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | -23.96% | -0.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -11.60% | +10.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -6.19% | +0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.05% | 11.38% | -3.33% |
Volatility
XNGS.L vs. XFSN.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that XNGS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFSN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNGS.L | XFSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 4.10% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 11.66% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.97% | 15.56% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 18.54% | +1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 18.54% | +1.32% |
XNGS.L vs. XFSN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XNGS.L and XFSN.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XNGS.L vs. XFSN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNGS.L nor XFSN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XNGS.L and XFSN.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNGS.L and XFSN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.
Find the right allocation for XNGS.L and XFSN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer