PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNGI.DE vs. XDWU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNGI.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XNGI.DE having a 13.67% return and XDWU.DE slightly lower at 13.17%.


XNGI.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
13.67%
6M
13.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDWU.DE

1D
0.70%
1M
5.43%
YTD
13.17%
6M
14.03%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
8.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNGI.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XNGI.DE and XDWU.DE is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNGI.DE vs. XDWU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNGI.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XDWU.DE
XDWU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XDWU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNGI.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XNGI.DEXDWU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.76

XNGI.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNGI.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNGI.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum XDWU.DE drawdown of -42.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNGI.DE and XDWU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNGI.DEXDWU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-42.00%

+23.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-0.87%

-4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-12.47%

+6.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

Volatility

XNGI.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNGI.DEXDWU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.56%

12.95%

+6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

14.25%

+5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

18.00%

+1.56%

XNGI.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNGI.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWU.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNGI.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNGI.DE nor XDWU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XNGI.DE and XDWU.DE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWU.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWU.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XNGI.DE.

XNGI.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while XDWU.DE is Utilities Equities. XNGI.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Next Generation Internet Innovation Select ESG Screened 100, while XDWU.DE tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XNGI.DE and 0.25% for XDWU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNGI.DE and XDWU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer