XNGI.DE vs. DBXJ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XNGI.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) and DBXJ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XNGI.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Next Generation Internet Innovation Select ESG Screened 100, while DBXJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNGI.DE returned 27.17%/yr vs 15.59%/yr for DBXJ.DE. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNGI.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DBXJ.DE.

Performance

XNGI.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XNGI.DE having a 17.43% return and DBXJ.DE slightly lower at 16.95%.

XNGI.DE

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 11.22%
• YTD: 17.43%
• 6M: 15.47%
• 1Y: 29.49%
• 3Y*: 27.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBXJ.DE

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 16.95%
• 6M: 16.85%
• 1Y: 31.98%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: 9.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNGI.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XNGI.DE Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C	17.43%	7.77%	43.41%	52.53%	-14.06%
DBXJ.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C	16.95%	12.59%	13.75%	16.43%	-1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XNGI.DE and DBXJ.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2022	0.50

Return for Risk

XNGI.DE vs. DBXJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNGI.DE

XNGI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 41
XNGI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XNGI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
XNGI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 46
XNGI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XNGI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 29

DBXJ.DE

DBXJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 54
DBXJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
DBXJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
DBXJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DBXJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
DBXJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNGI.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XNGI.DE	DBXJ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.63	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	2.49	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.31	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	2.99	-1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.10	9.82	-5.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XNGI.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNGI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the DBXJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNGI.DE and DBXJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XNGI.DE	DBXJ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	1.63	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.26	+0.93

Drawdowns

XNGI.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNGI.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.91%, smaller than the maximum DBXJ.DE drawdown of -51.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNGI.DE and DBXJ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNGI.DE	DBXJ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.91%	-51.22%	+23.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.97%	-10.22%	-8.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.91%	-16.96%	-10.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-0.42%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-14.63%	+8.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.40%	3.12%	+4.28%

Volatility

XNGI.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) at 3.40%. This indicates that XNGI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNGI.DE	DBXJ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.48%	3.40%	+2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.40%	14.91%	-1.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.27%	18.74%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.70%	16.56%	+4.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.70%	16.38%	+4.32%

XNGI.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNGI.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DBXJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNGI.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNGI.DE nor DBXJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNGI.DE and DBXJ.DE in my portfolio?

XNGI.DE and DBXJ.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XNGI.DE or DBXJ.DE?

On fees, DBXJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNGI.DE or DBXJ.DE?

DBXJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XNGI.DE.

What is the main difference between XNGI.DE and DBXJ.DE?

XNGI.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while DBXJ.DE is Japan Equities. XNGI.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Next Generation Internet Innovation Select ESG Screened 100, while DBXJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XNGI.DE and 0.12% for DBXJ.DE.