XNAS.L vs. XMME.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.L).
XNAS.L and XMME.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XNAS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. XMME.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Total Return Net Emerging Markets Index. It was launched on Jun 21, 2017. Both XNAS.L and XMME.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XNAS.L vs. XMME.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XNAS.L vs. XMME.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | -5.13% | 19.83% | 26.60% | 56.41% | -1.82% |
XMME.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 1.35% | 33.78% | 7.37% | 9.61% | 10.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.L achieves a -5.13% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.L's 1.35% return.
XNAS.L
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -5.13%
- 6M
- -2.24%
- 1Y
- 24.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMME.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -9.62%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- 29.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XNAS.L vs. XMME.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XNAS.L vs. XMME.L — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.L
XMME.L
XNAS.L vs. XMME.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAS.L | XMME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 1.62 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 2.12 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.30 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 2.29 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.04 | 8.20 | +1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAS.L | XMME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.62 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.32 | +1.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.L and XMME.L is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XNAS.L vs. XMME.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNAS.L nor XMME.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XNAS.L vs. XMME.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum XMME.L drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.L and XMME.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.L | XMME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.92% | -40.28% | +17.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -12.95% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.52% | -12.73% | +5.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -15.71% | +12.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.61% | -0.66% |
Volatility
XNAS.L vs. XMME.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) is 5.98%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.L) has a volatility of 9.37%. This indicates that XNAS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.L | XMME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 9.37% | -3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 13.76% | -1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.82% | 19.05% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 18.17% | +1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 19.67% | -0.25% |