PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XNAS.L vs. XDJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XNAS.L vs. XDJP.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L).

XNAS.L and XDJP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XNAS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. XDJP.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Jan 25, 2013. Both XNAS.L and XDJP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XNAS.L vs. XDJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XNAS.L vs. XDJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XNAS.L
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		-5.13%19.83%26.60%56.41%-1.82%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D		7.03%30.18%7.85%21.61%8.12%
Different Trading Currencies

XNAS.L is traded in USD, while XDJP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDJP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNAS.L achieves a -5.13% return, which is significantly lower than XDJP.L's 7.03% return.

XNAS.L

1D
3.29%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
-5.13%
6M
-2.24%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
23.19%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

XDJP.L

1D
4.99%
1M
-5.89%
YTD
7.03%
6M
13.28%
1Y
45.49%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D

Often compared with XNAS.L:
XNAS.L vs. CNDX.LXNAS.L vs. SXRV.DEXNAS.L vs. QQQMXNAS.L vs. EQQQ.LXNAS.L vs. CSNDX.MIXNAS.L vs. NUCG.LXNAS.L vs. JEPG.L
Often compared with XDJP.L:
XDJP.L vs. CNKY.LXDJP.L vs. VJPN.LXDJP.L vs. DXJG.LXDJP.L vs. DXJXDJP.L vs. PAXG.LXDJP.L vs. CSJP.LXDJP.L vs. JPJP.L

XNAS.L vs. XDJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNAS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XDJP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XNAS.L
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D

Return for Risk

XNAS.L vs. XDJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XNAS.L
XNAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNAS.L vs. XDJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XNAS.LXDJP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

1.87

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

2.64

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.93

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.04

10.07

-0.03

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XNAS.L vs. XDJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNAS.L and XDJP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XNAS.LXDJP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.87

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.35

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.60

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.57

+0.76

Correlation

The correlation between XNAS.L and XDJP.L is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XNAS.L vs. XDJP.L - Dividend Comparison

XNAS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XNAS.L
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D		1.26%1.33%1.41%1.59%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%

Drawdowns

XNAS.L vs. XDJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNAS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum XDJP.L drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.L and XDJP.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XNAS.LXDJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-23.69%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-13.40%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-20.61%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-23.69%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.52%

-8.22%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-6.87%

+3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

4.27%

-1.32%

Volatility

XNAS.L vs. XDJP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) is 5.98%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a volatility of 9.44%. This indicates that XNAS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XNAS.LXDJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

9.44%

-3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

18.16%

-6.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.82%

24.24%

-4.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.42%

19.55%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.42%

18.81%

+0.61%