XNAS.L vs. CSPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L).
XNAS.L and CSPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XNAS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. Both XNAS.L and CSPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XNAS.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XNAS.L vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | -5.13% | 19.83% | 26.60% | 56.41% | -1.82% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.10% | 17.45% | 25.25% | 26.74% | 3.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.L achieves a -5.13% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.L's -4.10% return.
XNAS.L
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -5.13%
- 6M
- -2.24%
- 1Y
- 24.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSPX.L
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- -4.10%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 18.28%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XNAS.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XNAS.L vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.L
CSPX.L
XNAS.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAS.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 1.12 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.64 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 3.49 | -0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.04 | 15.57 | -5.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAS.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.12 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.88 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.L and CSPX.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XNAS.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNAS.L nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XNAS.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum CSPX.L drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.L and CSPX.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.92% | -33.90% | +10.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -11.83% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.52% | -5.43% | -2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -3.76% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 1.83% | +1.12% |
Volatility
XNAS.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 4.90%. This indicates that XNAS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 4.90% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 8.88% | +3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.82% | 16.12% | +3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 15.95% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 16.15% | +3.27% |