XMWX.L vs. XNAS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L).
XMWX.L and XNAS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMWX.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World ex USA Index. It was launched on Jun 3, 2024. XNAS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. Both XMWX.L and XNAS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XMWX.L vs. XNAS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XMWX.L vs. XNAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XMWX.L Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C | 3.39% | 23.16% | -1.64% |
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | -5.13% | 19.83% | 8.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMWX.L achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly higher than XNAS.L's -5.13% return.
XMWX.L
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.L
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -5.13%
- 6M
- -2.24%
- 1Y
- 24.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMWX.L vs. XNAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMWX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XMWX.L vs. XNAS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMWX.L
XNAS.L
XMWX.L vs. XNAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMWX.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.24 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 1.84 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.25 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.71 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.26 | 10.04 | -0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMWX.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.24 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 1.33 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between XMWX.L and XNAS.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XMWX.L vs. XNAS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMWX.L nor XNAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XMWX.L vs. XNAS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMWX.L drawdown since its inception was -12.53%, smaller than the maximum XNAS.L drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMWX.L and XNAS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMWX.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.53% | -22.92% | +10.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -12.62% | +2.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | -7.52% | +1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -3.12% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 2.95% | -0.47% |
Volatility
XMWX.L vs. XNAS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) have volatilities of 5.97% and 5.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XMWX.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 5.98% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.34% | 11.91% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.29% | 19.82% | -6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.38% | 19.42% | -7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.38% | 19.42% | -7.04% |