PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMWX.L vs. XDWH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XMWX.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XMWX.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XMWX.L
Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C
3.39%23.16%-1.64%
XDWH.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
-3.53%15.25%-13.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMWX.L achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -3.53% return.


XMWX.L

1D
2.66%
1M
-3.77%
YTD
3.39%
6M
8.68%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDWH.L

1D
2.09%
1M
-5.57%
YTD
-3.53%
6M
4.19%
1Y
6.01%
3Y*
5.91%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XMWX.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMWX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XMWX.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMWX.L
XMWX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XMWX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMWX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMWX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XMWX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMWX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWH.L
XDWH.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMWX.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMWX.LXDWH.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

0.36

+1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

0.61

+1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.08

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

0.70

+1.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.26

1.93

+7.34

XMWX.L vs. XDWH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMWX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMWX.L and XDWH.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMWX.LXDWH.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

0.36

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

0.57

+0.65

Correlation

The correlation between XMWX.L and XDWH.L is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XMWX.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMWX.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XMWX.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMWX.L drawdown since its inception was -12.53%, smaller than the maximum XDWH.L drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMWX.L and XDWH.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XMWX.LXDWH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.53%

-26.24%

+13.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-9.86%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.53%

-6.58%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-4.93%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

3.59%

-1.11%

Volatility

XMWX.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) at 5.11%. This indicates that XMWX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XMWX.LXDWH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

5.11%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

9.31%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.29%

16.44%

-3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.38%

13.94%

-1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.38%

14.91%

-2.53%