XMV.TO vs. CFOU.TO
XMV.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF) and CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMV.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMV.TO returned 9.57%/yr vs 23.35%/yr for CFOU.TO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMV.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CFOU.TO.
Performance
XMV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMV.TO achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 27.75% return. Over the past 10 years, XMV.TO has underperformed CFOU.TO with an annualized return of 9.57%, while CFOU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 23.35% annualized return.
XMV.TO
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 5.85%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 12.30%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 6M
- 35.24%
- 1Y
- 96.97%
- 3Y*
- 59.80%
- 5Y*
- 29.38%
- 10Y*
- 23.35%
XMV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMV.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF | 8.91% | 17.87% | 15.63% | 10.94% | -1.64% | 21.41% | -1.75% | 23.41% | -7.65% | 6.85% |
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 27.75% | 69.17% | 56.15% | 18.37% | -23.64% | 79.61% | -14.70% | 40.45% | -21.67% | 22.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMV.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2012 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XMV.TO and CFOU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMV.TO
CFOU.TO
Financial Services
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
XMV.TO
CFOU.TO
Energy
XMV.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Industrials
XMV.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Basic Materials
XMV.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
XMV.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Utilities
XMV.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
XMV.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Communication Services
XMV.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Technology
XMV.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Real Estate
XMV.TO
CFOU.TO
-
Healthcare
XMV.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMV.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XMV.TO
CFOU.TO
XMV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF (XMV.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMV.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.61 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 6.06 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | 24.79 | -14.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMV.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 3.91 | -2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 1.07 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.69 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.34 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
XMV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMV.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMV.TO and CFOU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMV.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.58% | -86.23% | +50.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.88% | -16.08% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.77% | -24.95% | +15.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.57% | -45.23% | +29.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.58% | -67.29% | +31.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -22.46% | +19.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 3.93% | -2.27% |
Volatility
XMV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF (XMV.TO) is 2.41%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that XMV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMV.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 8.75% | -6.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 21.17% | -13.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.34% | 24.93% | -15.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.41% | 27.61% | -17.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.94% | 33.86% | -20.92% |
XMV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMV.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOU.TO's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison
XMV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, while CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMV.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Canada Index ETF | 2.09% | 2.21% | 2.33% | 2.62% | 2.41% | 2.04% | 2.73% | 2.44% | 2.93% | 2.49% | 2.11% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMV.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMV.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMV.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
XMV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CFOU.TO is Leveraged Equities. XMV.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while CFOU.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for XMV.TO and 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
Find the right allocation for XMV.TO and CFOU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer