PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMUS.L vs. HIUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMUS.L vs. HIUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L) and HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMUS.L is traded in GBp, while HIUS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HIUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMUS.L achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than HIUS.L's 28.30% return.


XMUS.L

1D
-0.20%
1M
5.96%
YTD
10.43%
6M
10.35%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
14.65%
10Y*
16.36%

HIUS.L

1D
1.12%
1M
18.25%
YTD
28.30%
6M
28.28%
1Y
50.97%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMUS.L vs. HIUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XMUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C
10.43%9.35%27.51%20.67%-4.33%
HIUS.L
HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
28.30%10.31%9.54%23.06%-3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XMUS.L and HIUS.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2022

0.89

The correlation between XMUS.L and HIUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMUS.L vs. HIUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMUS.L
XMUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XMUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XMUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

HIUS.L
HIUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
HIUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMUS.L vs. HIUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L) and HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMUS.LHIUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.61

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

7.36

-3.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.96

21.02

-8.06

XMUS.L vs. HIUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the HIUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMUS.L and HIUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMUS.LHIUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

3.52

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.19

-0.44

Drawdowns

XMUS.L vs. HIUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, which is greater than HIUS.L's maximum drawdown of -25.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMUS.L and HIUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMUS.LHIUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.33%

-25.20%

-9.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.68%

-6.86%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.47%

-25.20%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-3.87%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.41%

-0.19%

Volatility

XMUS.L vs. HIUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L) is 2.62%, while HSBC MSCI USA Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIUS.L) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that XMUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMUS.LHIUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

5.45%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

10.80%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.73%

14.40%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

15.67%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

15.67%

+0.05%

XMUS.L vs. HIUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMUS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HIUS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMUS.L vs. HIUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMUS.L nor HIUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XMUS.L and HIUS.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMUS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMUS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HIUS.L.

XMUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while HIUS.L tracks MSCI USA Islamic ESG Universal Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XMUS.L and 0.30% for HIUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMUS.L and HIUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer