PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMUS.L vs. FEXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMUS.L vs. FEXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L) and First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FEXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMUS.L is traded in GBp, while FEXU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FEXU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMUS.L achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than FEXU.L's 14.79% return. Over the past 10 years, XMUS.L has outperformed FEXU.L with an annualized return of 16.36%, while FEXU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.68% annualized return.


XMUS.L

1D
-0.20%
1M
5.96%
YTD
10.43%
6M
10.35%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
14.65%
10Y*
16.36%

FEXU.L

1D
0.44%
1M
5.65%
YTD
14.79%
6M
15.34%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
13.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMUS.L vs. FEXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C
10.43%9.35%27.51%20.67%-10.46%29.34%16.78%26.80%0.08%10.99%
FEXU.L
First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF
14.79%7.02%18.72%8.91%-1.84%28.02%10.20%21.26%-5.74%11.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XMUS.L and FEXU.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2013

0.85

The correlation between XMUS.L and FEXU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMUS.L vs. FEXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMUS.L
FEXU.L

Technology

35.4%
18.8%

Financial Services

11.6%
14.3%

Communication Services

11.3%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.5%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.9%

Industrials

8.6%
19.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.5%

Energy

3.6%
6.3%

Utilities

2.3%
7.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
4.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.5%

Technology

XMUS.L
35.4%
FEXU.L
18.8%

Financial Services

XMUS.L
11.6%
FEXU.L
14.3%

Communication Services

XMUS.L
11.3%
FEXU.L
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XMUS.L
10.1%
FEXU.L
8.5%

Healthcare

XMUS.L
8.6%
FEXU.L
8.9%

Industrials

XMUS.L
8.6%
FEXU.L
19.4%

Consumer Defensive

XMUS.L
4.8%
FEXU.L
4.5%

Energy

XMUS.L
3.6%
FEXU.L
6.3%

Utilities

XMUS.L
2.3%
FEXU.L
7.5%

Real Estate

XMUS.L
1.9%
FEXU.L
4.7%

Basic Materials

XMUS.L
1.8%
FEXU.L
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMUS.L vs. FEXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMUS.L
XMUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XMUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XMUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FEXU.L
FEXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FEXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FEXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMUS.L vs. FEXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L) and First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FEXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMUS.LFEXU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.43

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

6.85

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.96

20.78

-7.82

XMUS.L vs. FEXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the FEXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMUS.L and FEXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMUS.LFEXU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

2.53

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.77

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.79

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.78

-0.03

Drawdowns

XMUS.L vs. FEXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, which is greater than FEXU.L's maximum drawdown of -32.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMUS.L and FEXU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMUS.LFEXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.33%

-32.12%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.68%

-4.47%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.47%

-21.55%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

-21.55%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.90%

-32.12%

+6.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-4.24%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

1.47%

+0.75%

Volatility

XMUS.L vs. FEXU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L) is 2.62%, while First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FEXU.L) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that XMUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMUS.LFEXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

4.32%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

8.60%

-1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.73%

12.14%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

15.66%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

17.33%

-1.61%

XMUS.L vs. FEXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMUS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FEXU.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMUS.L vs. FEXU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMUS.L nor FEXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XMUS.L and FEXU.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMUS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMUS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEXU.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XMUS.L and 0.75% for FEXU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMUS.L and FEXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer