XMUS.L vs. DGRP.L
XMUS.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and DGRP.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - XMUS.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while DGRP.L tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMUS.L returned 14.65%/yr vs 12.85%/yr for DGRP.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMUS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for DGRP.L.
Performance
XMUS.L vs. DGRP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMUS.L achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly higher than DGRP.L's 6.55% return.
XMUS.L
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 28.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.65%
- 10Y*
- 16.36%
DGRP.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 6.55%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- 21.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.85%
- 10Y*
- —
XMUS.L vs. DGRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMUS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 10.43% | 9.35% | 27.51% | 20.67% | -10.46% | 29.34% | 16.78% | 26.80% | 0.08% | 10.99% |
DGRP.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD | 6.55% | 5.43% | 20.19% | 12.25% | 2.72% | 26.66% | 10.26% | 25.55% | -1.13% | 15.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMUS.L and DGRP.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2016 | 0.92 |
The correlation between XMUS.L and DGRP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMUS.L vs. DGRP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMUS.L
DGRP.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
XMUS.L
DGRP.L
Financial Services
XMUS.L
DGRP.L
Communication Services
XMUS.L
DGRP.L
Consumer Cyclical
XMUS.L
DGRP.L
Healthcare
XMUS.L
DGRP.L
Industrials
XMUS.L
DGRP.L
Consumer Defensive
XMUS.L
DGRP.L
Energy
XMUS.L
DGRP.L
Utilities
XMUS.L
DGRP.L
Real Estate
XMUS.L
DGRP.L
-
Basic Materials
XMUS.L
DGRP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMUS.L vs. DGRP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMUS.L
DGRP.L
XMUS.L vs. DGRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (DGRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMUS.L | DGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.43 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 3.47 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.96 | 12.99 | -0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMUS.L | DGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.37 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 1.02 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.93 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
XMUS.L vs. DGRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, which is greater than DGRP.L's maximum drawdown of -22.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMUS.L and DGRP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMUS.L | DGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -22.56% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.68% | -6.06% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.47% | -17.76% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.47% | -17.76% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.01% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -2.97% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 1.62% | +0.60% |
Volatility
XMUS.L vs. DGRP.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (DGRP.L) at 2.42%. This indicates that XMUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMUS.L | DGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 2.42% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.26% | 6.17% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.73% | 8.95% | +1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 12.55% | +2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 14.35% | +1.37% |
XMUS.L vs. DGRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMUS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRP.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMUS.L vs. DGRP.L - Dividend Comparison
XMUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRP.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD | 1.01% | 1.10% | 1.16% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 1.34% | 2.74% | 2.32% | 1.90% | 1.36% |
XMUS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMUS.L and DGRP.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMUS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMUS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRP.L.
XMUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while DGRP.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XMUS.L and 0.33% for DGRP.L.
Find the right allocation for XMUS.L and DGRP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer