XMTW.L vs. XSTC.L
XMTW.L (Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XMTW.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMTW.L returned 23.60%/yr vs 24.75%/yr for XSTC.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMTW.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSTC.L.
Performance
XMTW.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMTW.L achieves a 70.55% return, which is significantly higher than XSTC.L's 26.01% return.
XMTW.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 20.59%
- YTD
- 70.55%
- 6M
- 76.21%
- 1Y
- 124.16%
- 3Y*
- 41.72%
- 5Y*
- 23.60%
- 10Y*
- 23.58%
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 19.05%
- YTD
- 26.01%
- 6M
- 25.07%
- 1Y
- 57.19%
- 3Y*
- 31.88%
- 5Y*
- 24.75%
- 10Y*
- —
XMTW.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMTW.L Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C | 70.55% | 23.98% | 25.99% | 21.66% | -21.11% | 28.96% | 32.40% | 29.87% | -0.69% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 26.01% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMTW.L and XSTC.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between XMTW.L and XSTC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMTW.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMTW.L
XSTC.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XMTW.L
XSTC.L
Financial Services
XMTW.L
XSTC.L
Industrials
XMTW.L
XSTC.L
Basic Materials
XMTW.L
XSTC.L
-
Communication Services
XMTW.L
XSTC.L
Consumer Cyclical
XMTW.L
XSTC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XMTW.L
XSTC.L
-
Healthcare
XMTW.L
XSTC.L
-
Energy
XMTW.L
-
XSTC.L
Real Estate
XMTW.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Utilities
XMTW.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMTW.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMTW.L
XSTC.L
XMTW.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMTW.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.88 | 1.48 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.63 | 3.25 | +10.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.74 | 8.36 | +29.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMTW.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.48 | 2.92 | +2.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 1.12 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.15 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
XMTW.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMTW.L drawdown since its inception was -47.86%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMTW.L and XSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMTW.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.86% | -29.30% | -18.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -17.49% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.76% | -29.30% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.18% | -29.30% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.59% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -6.30% | -2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 6.82% | -3.54% |
Volatility
XMTW.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) at 6.44%. This indicates that XMTW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMTW.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.44% | 6.44% | +3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.10% | 14.26% | +3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.53% | 19.60% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 22.20% | -1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 22.42% | -2.36% |
XMTW.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMTW.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMTW.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
XMTW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMTW.L Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMTW.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMTW.L.
XMTW.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XMTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XMTW.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.
Find the right allocation for XMTW.L and XSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer