PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMS.TO vs. XUU-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMS.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMS.TO is traded in CAD, while XUU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMS.TO achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than XUU-U.TO's 12.58% return.


XMS.TO

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.94%
YTD
1.17%
6M
-0.55%
1Y
0.08%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
7.82%

XUU-U.TO

1D
0.03%
1M
7.44%
YTD
12.58%
6M
10.92%
1Y
29.83%
3Y*
22.81%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMS.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
1.17%3.71%14.23%7.84%-11.15%21.02%1.81%3.45%
XUU-U.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF
12.58%11.00%33.03%23.73%-14.72%26.98%16.71%6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XMS.TO and XUU-U.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.13

The correlation between XMS.TO and XUU-U.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMS.TO vs. XUU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMS.TO
XMS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XUU-U.TO
XUU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XUU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMS.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMS.TOXUU-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.49

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

3.49

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.03

13.31

-13.28

XMS.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the XUU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMS.TO and XUU-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMS.TOXUU-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

2.51

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.97

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.96

-0.42

Drawdowns

XMS.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMS.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, which is greater than XUU-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMS.TO and XUU-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMS.TOXUU-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.48%

-24.77%

-11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-8.58%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.82%

-20.06%

+10.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-22.68%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

0.00%

-1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-4.88%

+0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.25%

+0.29%

Volatility

XMS.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) is 2.35%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that XMS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMS.TOXUU-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

2.86%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.14%

9.19%

-3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.75%

11.93%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

16.25%

-4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.74%

17.36%

-2.62%

XMS.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMS.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than XUU-U.TO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMS.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than XUU-U.TO's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
1.18%1.08%1.21%1.38%1.20%0.99%1.66%1.40%1.54%1.53%1.43%
XUU-U.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF
0.74%0.83%0.76%0.85%1.01%0.77%0.90%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMS.TO and XUU-U.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUU-U.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUU-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for XMS.TO.

XMS.TO tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index, while XUU-U.TO tracks S&P Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for XMS.TO and 0.08% for XUU-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMS.TO and XUU-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer