PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XMS.TO vs. XEI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XMS.TO vs. XEI.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMS.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and XEI.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMS.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index, while XEI.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMS.TO returned 7.82%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for XEI.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMS.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for XEI.TO.

Performance

XMS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMS.TO achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than XEI.TO's 22.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XMS.TO has underperformed XEI.TO with an annualized return of 7.82%, while XEI.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.32% annualized return.

XMS.TO

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.94%
YTD
1.17%
6M
-0.55%
1Y
0.08%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
7.82%

XEI.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
3.33%
YTD
22.21%
6M
23.56%
1Y
43.59%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
15.55%
10Y*
12.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.17%3.71%14.23%7.84%-11.15%21.02%1.81%26.70%-1.63%16.85%
XEI.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF		22.21%25.96%15.42%6.69%0.41%35.88%-7.53%25.44%-10.85%7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XMS.TO and XEI.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2016

0.38

The correlation between XMS.TO and XEI.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XMS.TO
XEI.TO

Technology

29.8%
0.7%

Financial Services

14.0%
31.4%

Healthcare

12.7%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%
0.5%

Utilities

7.5%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
6.2%

Industrials

6.2%
0.7%

Communication Services

5.9%
7.6%

Energy

3.5%
32.1%

Real Estate

2.2%
4.8%

Basic Materials

2.1%
4.6%

Technology

XMS.TO
29.8%
XEI.TO
0.7%

Financial Services

XMS.TO
14.0%
XEI.TO
31.4%

Healthcare

XMS.TO
12.7%
XEI.TO
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

XMS.TO
9.9%
XEI.TO
0.5%

Utilities

XMS.TO
7.5%
XEI.TO
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XMS.TO
6.2%
XEI.TO
6.2%

Industrials

XMS.TO
6.2%
XEI.TO
0.7%

Communication Services

XMS.TO
5.9%
XEI.TO
7.6%

Energy

XMS.TO
3.5%
XEI.TO
32.1%

Real Estate

XMS.TO
2.2%
XEI.TO
4.8%

Basic Materials

XMS.TO
2.1%
XEI.TO
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF

Often compared with XMS.TO:
XMS.TO vs. XMU.TOXMS.TO vs. VFV.TOXMS.TO vs. XDU.TOXMS.TO vs. VSP.TOXMS.TO vs. XUS.TOXMS.TO vs. SPYXMS.TO vs. ZSP.TO
Often compared with XEI.TO:
XEI.TO vs. VDY.TOXEI.TO vs. XDIV.TOXEI.TO vs. XEQT.TOXEI.TO vs. VFV.TOXEI.TO vs. ZDV.TOXEI.TO vs. CDZ.TOXEI.TO vs. XDV.TO

Return for Risk

XMS.TO vs. XEI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XMS.TO
XMS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
XEI.TO
XEI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XMS.TOXEI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.01
6.08

-6.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.07
9.07

-8.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

2.27

-1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

19.53

-19.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.03

66.28

-66.25

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 6.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMS.TO and XEI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XMS.TOXEI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

6.08

-6.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

1.39

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.77

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.67

-0.12

Drawdowns

XMS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMS.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, smaller than the maximum XEI.TO drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMS.TO and XEI.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XMS.TOXEI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.48%

-45.51%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-2.24%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.82%

-9.92%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-17.32%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.48%

-45.51%

+9.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-0.76%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-5.05%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

0.66%

+1.88%

Volatility

XMS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) is 2.35%, while iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that XMS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XMS.TOXEI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

2.87%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.14%

6.01%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.75%

7.21%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

11.24%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.74%

16.01%

-1.27%

XMS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMS.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than XEI.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than XEI.TO's 3.56% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEI.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF		3.56%4.39%5.56%5.08%4.78%3.65%5.13%4.71%5.53%4.37%4.51%5.75%
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.18%1.08%1.21%1.38%1.20%0.99%1.66%1.40%1.54%1.53%1.43%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XMS.TO and XEI.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEI.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEI.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for XMS.TO.

XMS.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XEI.TO is Canada Equities. XMS.TO tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index, while XEI.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for XMS.TO and 0.22% for XEI.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMS.TO and XEI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer