PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XMS.TO vs. DRFU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XMS.TO vs. DRFU.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

XMS.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and DRFU.TO (Desjardins RI USA Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. XMS.TO is passively managed, while DRFU.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMS.TO returned 4.59%/yr vs 14.24%/yr for DRFU.TO. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XMS.TO vs. DRFU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) and Desjardins RI USA Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMS.TO achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than DRFU.TO's 12.29% return.

XMS.TO

1D
1.69%
1M
1.67%
6M
3.05%
YTD
2.35%
1Y
2.02%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
7.47%

DRFU.TO

1D
-2.58%
1M
-1.18%
6M
11.18%
YTD
12.29%
1Y
26.04%
3Y*
21.30%
5Y*
14.24%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMS.TO vs. DRFU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.35%3.74%14.27%7.88%-11.12%21.05%1.86%25.99%-8.83%
DRFU.TO
Desjardins RI USA Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		12.29%12.18%37.32%5.44%-9.19%29.41%7.31%21.84%-8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XMS.TO and DRFU.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2018

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Desjardins RI USA Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

Often compared with XMS.TO:
XMS.TO vs. XMU.TOXMS.TO vs. VFV.TOXMS.TO vs. XDU.TOXMS.TO vs. VSP.TOXMS.TO vs. XUS.TOXMS.TO vs. SPYXMS.TO vs. ZSP.TO
Often compared with DRFU.TO:
DRFU.TO vs. DANC.TODRFU.TO vs. DCG.TODRFU.TO vs. DCS.TODRFU.TO vs. DRFD.TODRFU.TO vs. DRFE.TODRFU.TO vs. DRFG.TODRFU.TO vs. DRMC.TO

Return for Risk

XMS.TO vs. DRFU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XMS.TO
XMS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
DRFU.TO
DRFU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DRFU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRFU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRFU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DRFU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRFU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMS.TO vs. DRFU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) and Desjardins RI USA Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XMS.TODRFU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.20
1.85

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.34
3.12

-2.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.53

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

3.81

-3.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.56

13.72

-13.16

XMS.TO vs. DRFU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the DRFU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMS.TO and DRFU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMS.TO vs. DRFU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMS.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.87%, which is greater than DRFU.TO's maximum drawdown of -19.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMS.TO and DRFU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XMS.TODRFU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.87%

-19.89%

-16.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-6.89%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.80%

-19.89%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

-19.89%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.87%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-2.58%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-4.91%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

1.91%

+1.68%

Volatility

XMS.TO vs. DRFU.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Desjardins RI USA Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFU.TO) at 3.53%. This indicates that XMS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRFU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XMS.TODRFU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.53%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.69%

11.63%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.39%

14.22%

-3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

16.41%

-4.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%

16.51%

-1.28%

Dividends

XMS.TO vs. DRFU.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than DRFU.TO's 1.04% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRFU.TO
Desjardins RI USA Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		1.04%0.76%0.60%0.80%1.05%1.08%1.38%1.37%0.41%0.00%0.00%
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.19%1.10%1.24%1.41%1.22%1.02%1.71%1.44%1.58%2.02%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

XMS.TO and DRFU.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Desjardins.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMS.TO and DRFU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer