XMMS.L vs. VFEG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMMS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) and VFEG.L (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from Xtrackers and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMMS.L returned 8.45%/yr vs 6.12%/yr for VFEG.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMMS.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VFEG.L.

Performance

XMMS.L vs. VFEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XMMS.L is traded in GBp, while VFEG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VFEG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMS.L achieves a 26.72% return, which is significantly higher than VFEG.L's 11.73% return.

XMMS.L

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: 6.34%
• YTD: 26.72%
• 6M: 27.92%
• 1Y: 53.72%
• 3Y*: 20.94%
• 5Y*: 8.45%
• 10Y*: —

VFEG.L

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 2.54%
• YTD: 11.73%
• 6M: 12.29%
• 1Y: 30.60%
• 3Y*: 15.18%
• 5Y*: 6.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMS.L vs. VFEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XMMS.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C	26.72%	24.71%	9.13%	2.81%	-10.67%	-1.61%	13.55%	5.22%
VFEG.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc	11.73%	17.15%	14.13%	1.28%	-7.26%	-0.01%	11.28%	4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMS.L and VFEG.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.94

The correlation between XMMS.L and VFEG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMMS.L vs. VFEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMMS.L	VFEG.L
Technology	36.9%	29.6%
Financial Services	19.5%	20.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	10.8%
Industrials	7.4%	7.1%
Communication Services	7.0%	7.5%
Basic Materials	6.5%	7.8%
Energy	4.1%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	3.6%
Healthcare	2.9%	3.4%
Utilities	2.1%	3.0%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.7%

Return for Risk

XMMS.L vs. VFEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMS.L

XMMS.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
XMMS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XMMS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
XMMS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XMMS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XMMS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

VFEG.L

VFEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VFEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VFEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VFEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
VFEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMS.L vs. VFEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMMS.L	VFEG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.17	2.21	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.07	2.97	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.40	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.84	3.39	+1.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.09	11.12	+5.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMMS.L vs. VFEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMS.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is higher than the VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMS.L and VFEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMMS.L	VFEG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.17	2.21	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.40	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.44	+0.01

Drawdowns

XMMS.L vs. VFEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMS.L drawdown since its inception was -27.76%, which is greater than VFEG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMS.L and VFEG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMMS.L	VFEG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.76%	-25.35%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.04%	-8.99%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.26%	-14.61%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.32%	-19.47%	-4.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-1.40%	-1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.00%	-8.82%	-1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	2.75%	+0.38%

Volatility

XMMS.L vs. VFEG.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) at 5.09%. This indicates that XMMS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMMS.L	VFEG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.37%	5.09%	+2.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.36%	11.04%	+3.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.90%	13.80%	+3.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.56%	15.17%	+1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.84%	17.44%	+1.40%

XMMS.L vs. VFEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMS.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than VFEG.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XMMS.L vs. VFEG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMMS.L nor VFEG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMMS.L and VFEG.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, XMMS.L and VFEG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XMMS.L or VFEG.L?

On fees, XMMS.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMMS.L or VFEG.L?

XMMS.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VFEG.L.

What is the main difference between XMMS.L and VFEG.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XMMS.L and 0.22% for VFEG.L.