XMME.L vs. XXTW.L
XMME.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) and XXTW.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMME.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Total Return Net Emerging Markets Index, while XXTW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XMME.L returned 52.12% vs 51.54% for XXTW.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMME.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XXTW.L.
Performance
XMME.L vs. XXTW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XMME.L is traded in USD, while XXTW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XXTW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMME.L achieves a 26.48% return, which is significantly higher than XXTW.L's 24.17% return.
XMME.L
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 26.48%
- 6M
- 28.66%
- 1Y
- 52.12%
- 3Y*
- 24.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- —
XXTW.L
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 14.17%
- YTD
- 24.17%
- 6M
- 23.85%
- 1Y
- 51.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMME.L vs. XXTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XMME.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 26.48% | 33.78% | 7.37% | 4.54% |
XXTW.L Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF | 24.17% | 22.41% | 33.94% | 14.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMME.L and XXTW.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023 | 0.58 |
The correlation between XMME.L and XXTW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMME.L vs. XXTW.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMME.L
XXTW.L
XMME.L vs. XXTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMME.L | XXTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.42 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 3.05 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.53 | 9.33 | +5.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMME.L | XXTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.58 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.61 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
XMME.L vs. XXTW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMME.L drawdown since its inception was -40.28%, which is greater than XXTW.L's maximum drawdown of -26.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMME.L and XXTW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMME.L | XXTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.28% | -26.61% | -13.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.95% | -16.84% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -2.61% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.45% | -4.09% | -11.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 5.51% | -1.93% |
Volatility
XMME.L vs. XXTW.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.L) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) at 6.79%. This indicates that XMME.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XXTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMME.L | XXTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.48% | 6.79% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 15.19% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.71% | 19.87% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 22.00% | -3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.92% | 22.00% | -2.08% |
XMME.L vs. XXTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMME.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XXTW.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMME.L vs. XXTW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMME.L nor XXTW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMME.L and XXTW.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMME.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XXTW.L.
XMME.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XXTW.L is Technology Equities. XMME.L tracks MSCI Total Return Net Emerging Markets Index, while XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XMME.L and 0.25% for XXTW.L.
Find the right allocation for XMME.L and XXTW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer