XMLH.DE vs. GN0M.DE
XMLH.DE (L&G Healthcare Technology & Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc) and GN0M.DE (Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XMLH.DE tracks the ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index while GN0M.DE tracks the Solactive Genomics. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XMLH.DE returned 7.32%/yr vs 4.19%/yr for GN0M.DE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMLH.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GN0M.DE.
Performance
XMLH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMLH.DE achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly lower than GN0M.DE's 24.33% return.
XMLH.DE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 37.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- -2.65%
- 10Y*
- —
GN0M.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 12.61%
- 6M
- 17.15%
- YTD
- 24.33%
- 1Y
- 64.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMLH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLH.DE L&G Healthcare Technology & Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc | 8.53% | 11.69% | 8.01% | -4.50% | -29.19% | -5.48% |
GN0M.DE Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF | 24.33% | 5.67% | -12.40% | -9.04% | -32.50% | -7.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLH.DE and GN0M.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XMLH.DE and GN0M.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMLH.DE vs. GN0M.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMLH.DE
GN0M.DE
XMLH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Healthcare Technology & Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc (XMLH.DE) and Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GN0M.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMLH.DE | GN0M.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.90 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | 9.85 | -3.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMLH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLH.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, smaller than the maximum GN0M.DE drawdown of -67.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLH.DE and GN0M.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMLH.DE | GN0M.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.48% | -67.19% | +15.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.46% | -16.68% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -45.68% | +17.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.16% | -35.12% | +13.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.17% | -42.95% | +17.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.91% | 6.59% | +0.32% |
Volatility
XMLH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Healthcare Technology & Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc (XMLH.DE) is 6.98%, while Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GN0M.DE) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that XMLH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GN0M.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMLH.DE | GN0M.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.98% | 8.70% | -1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.00% | 20.26% | -4.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 28.51% | -7.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.53% | 31.42% | -8.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 31.42% | -7.63% |
XMLH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMLH.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GN0M.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMLH.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMLH.DE nor GN0M.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMLH.DE and GN0M.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMLH.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMLH.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GN0M.DE.
XMLH.DE tracks ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index, while GN0M.DE tracks Solactive Genomics. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMLH.DE and 0.50% for GN0M.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMLH.DE and GN0M.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer