XMLD.DE vs. XMAW.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMLD.DE (L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF) and XMAW.DE (Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XMLD.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence, while XMAW.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMLD.DE returned 19.02%/yr vs 12.21%/yr for XMAW.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMLD.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XMAW.DE.

Performance

XMLD.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMLD.DE achieves a 42.18% return, which is significantly higher than XMAW.DE's 12.49% return.

XMLD.DE

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 20.65%
• YTD: 42.18%
• 6M: 39.73%
• 1Y: 73.37%
• 3Y*: 33.99%
• 5Y*: 19.02%
• 10Y*: —

XMAW.DE

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 12.49%
• 6M: 13.08%
• 1Y: 26.98%
• 3Y*: 18.18%
• 5Y*: 12.21%
• 10Y*: 12.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMLD.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XMLD.DE L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF	42.18%	16.99%	25.17%	54.28%	-36.45%	19.09%	51.75%	0.00%
XMAW.DE Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	12.49%	8.98%	25.39%	19.46%	-15.01%	28.71%	5.50%	0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XMLD.DE and XMAW.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019	0.77

The correlation between XMLD.DE and XMAW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XMLD.DE vs. XMAW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMLD.DE

XMLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 78
XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XMLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
XMLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 75
XMLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
XMLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 68

XMAW.DE

XMAW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 72
XMAW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
XMAW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
XMAW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
XMAW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XMAW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMLD.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMLD.DE	XMAW.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	2.22	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	3.11	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.41	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.62	3.68	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.52	14.79	-2.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMLD.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the XMAW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMLD.DE and XMAW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMLD.DE	XMAW.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.76	2.22	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.84	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.77	+0.06

Drawdowns

XMLD.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than XMAW.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLD.DE and XMAW.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMLD.DE	XMAW.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.81%	-33.49%	-9.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.80%	-7.30%	-8.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.67%	-22.10%	-11.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.81%	-22.10%	-20.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.30%	-0.67%	-1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.51%	-4.90%	-8.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.84%	1.82%	+4.02%

Volatility

XMLD.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.DE) at 3.16%. This indicates that XMLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMLD.DE	XMAW.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.34%	3.16%	+7.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.89%	8.70%	+11.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.47%	12.11%	+14.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.22%	14.30%	+12.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.52%	15.23%	+13.29%

XMLD.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMLD.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAW.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMLD.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMLD.DE nor XMAW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMLD.DE and XMAW.DE in my portfolio?

XMLD.DE and XMAW.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMLD.DE or XMAW.DE?

On fees, XMAW.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMLD.DE or XMAW.DE?

XMAW.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMLD.DE.

What is the main difference between XMLD.DE and XMAW.DE?

XMLD.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while XMAW.DE is Global Equities. XMLD.DE tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence, while XMAW.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMLD.DE and 0.25% for XMAW.DE.