XMLD.DE vs. WEBA.DE
XMLD.DE (L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF) and WEBA.DE (Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D) are both Technology Equities funds - XMLD.DE tracks the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence while WEBA.DE tracks the Solactive United States Technology 100 Equal Weight. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XMLD.DE returned 33.99%/yr vs 16.93%/yr for WEBA.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMLD.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for WEBA.DE.
Performance
XMLD.DE vs. WEBA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMLD.DE achieves a 42.18% return, which is significantly higher than WEBA.DE's 22.42% return.
XMLD.DE
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 20.65%
- YTD
- 42.18%
- 6M
- 39.73%
- 1Y
- 73.37%
- 3Y*
- 33.99%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- —
WEBA.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 22.42%
- 6M
- 22.02%
- 1Y
- 28.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMLD.DE vs. WEBA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLD.DE L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF | 42.18% | 16.99% | 25.17% | 54.28% | -5.31% |
WEBA.DE Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D | 22.42% | 1.17% | 15.40% | 31.31% | -7.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLD.DE and WEBA.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between XMLD.DE and WEBA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMLD.DE vs. WEBA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMLD.DE
WEBA.DE
XMLD.DE vs. WEBA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) and Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D (WEBA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMLD.DE | WEBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.37 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.62 | 4.28 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 11.15 | +1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMLD.DE | WEBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 2.10 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.02 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
XMLD.DE vs. WEBA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than WEBA.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLD.DE and WEBA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMLD.DE | WEBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -25.46% | -17.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.80% | -6.70% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.67% | -25.46% | -8.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -0.40% | -1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.51% | -4.36% | -9.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 2.58% | +3.26% |
Volatility
XMLD.DE vs. WEBA.DE - Volatility Comparison
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D (WEBA.DE) at 3.95%. This indicates that XMLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEBA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMLD.DE | WEBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.34% | 3.95% | +6.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.89% | 9.72% | +10.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.47% | 13.66% | +12.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.22% | 16.55% | +10.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.52% | 16.55% | +11.97% |
XMLD.DE vs. WEBA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMLD.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBA.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMLD.DE vs. WEBA.DE - Dividend Comparison
XMLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WEBA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBA.DE Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D | 0.55% | 0.73% | 0.63% | 0.05% |
XMLD.DE L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMLD.DE and WEBA.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WEBA.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WEBA.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMLD.DE.
XMLD.DE tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence, while WEBA.DE tracks Solactive United States Technology 100 Equal Weight. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMLD.DE and 0.07% for WEBA.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMLD.DE and WEBA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer