XMLD.DE vs. QDVH.DE
XMLD.DE (L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF) and QDVH.DE (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XMLD.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence, while QDVH.DE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMLD.DE returned 19.02%/yr vs 8.98%/yr for QDVH.DE. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMLD.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVH.DE.
Performance
XMLD.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMLD.DE achieves a 42.18% return, which is significantly higher than QDVH.DE's -4.21% return.
XMLD.DE
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 20.65%
- YTD
- 42.18%
- 6M
- 39.73%
- 1Y
- 73.37%
- 3Y*
- 33.99%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVH.DE
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- 1.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
XMLD.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLD.DE L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF | 42.18% | 16.99% | 25.17% | 54.28% | -36.45% | 19.09% | 51.75% | 0.00% |
QDVH.DE iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -4.21% | 3.01% | 37.13% | 8.44% | -6.23% | 48.50% | -12.20% | -0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLD.DE and QDVH.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMLD.DE vs. QDVH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMLD.DE
QDVH.DE
XMLD.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMLD.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.03 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.62 | 0.14 | +4.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 0.33 | +12.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMLD.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 0.13 | +2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.49 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.48 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
XMLD.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVH.DE drawdown of -42.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLD.DE and QDVH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMLD.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -42.39% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.80% | -12.76% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.67% | -21.72% | -11.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.81% | -21.72% | -21.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -9.46% | +7.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.51% | -7.90% | -5.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 5.55% | +0.29% |
Volatility
XMLD.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Volatility Comparison
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE) at 4.30%. This indicates that XMLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMLD.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.34% | 4.30% | +6.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.89% | 10.53% | +9.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.47% | 14.63% | +11.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.22% | 18.23% | +8.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.52% | 20.90% | +7.62% |
XMLD.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMLD.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVH.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMLD.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMLD.DE nor QDVH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMLD.DE and QDVH.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVH.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVH.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMLD.DE.
XMLD.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while QDVH.DE is Financials Equities. XMLD.DE tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence, while QDVH.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMLD.DE and 0.15% for QDVH.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMLD.DE and QDVH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer