XMLD.DE vs. LSMC.DE
XMLD.DE (L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMLD.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMLD.DE returned 19.02%/yr vs 36.20%/yr for LSMC.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMLD.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
XMLD.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMLD.DE achieves a 42.18% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return.
XMLD.DE
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 20.65%
- YTD
- 42.18%
- 6M
- 39.73%
- 1Y
- 73.37%
- 3Y*
- 33.99%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- —
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 16.45%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 64.57%
- 1Y
- 130.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
XMLD.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLD.DE L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF | 42.18% | 16.99% | 25.17% | 54.28% | -36.45% | 19.09% | 51.75% | 0.00% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -34.66% | 37.56% | 23.03% | -0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLD.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XMLD.DE and LSMC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMLD.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMLD.DE
LSMC.DE
XMLD.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMLD.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.59 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.62 | 10.37 | -5.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 32.83 | -20.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMLD.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 4.27 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.15 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.82 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
XMLD.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLD.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMLD.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -39.77% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.80% | -12.53% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.67% | -36.22% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.81% | -39.77% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -3.34% | +1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.51% | -9.37% | -4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 3.96% | +1.88% |
Volatility
XMLD.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) is 10.34%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that XMLD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMLD.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.34% | 11.23% | -0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.89% | 22.18% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.47% | 30.40% | -3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.22% | 31.21% | -3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.52% | 26.06% | +2.46% |
XMLD.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMLD.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMLD.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMLD.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMLD.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LSMC.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LSMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMLD.DE.
XMLD.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. XMLD.DE tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMLD.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMLD.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer