PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMLD.DE vs. ESIT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMLD.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMLD.DE achieves a 38.82% return, which is significantly higher than ESIT.DE's 36.02% return.


XMLD.DE

1D
-1.67%
1M
-1.44%
6M
36.84%
YTD
38.82%
1Y
62.64%
3Y*
32.03%
5Y*
16.80%
10Y*

ESIT.DE

1D
-1.29%
1M
-9.82%
6M
25.74%
YTD
36.02%
1Y
44.77%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMLD.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XMLD.DE
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
38.82%16.99%25.20%54.24%-36.43%19.04%9.24%
ESIT.DE
iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
36.02%10.04%7.42%34.97%-28.99%36.95%8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XMLD.DE and ESIT.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.73

The correlation between XMLD.DE and ESIT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMLD.DE vs. ESIT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMLD.DE
XMLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIT.DE
ESIT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ESIT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMLD.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMLD.DEESIT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.27

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

3.92

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.32

9.47

+0.85

XMLD.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the ESIT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMLD.DE and ESIT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMLD.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, which is greater than ESIT.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLD.DE and ESIT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMLD.DEESIT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.77%

-38.29%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.79%

-11.38%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.66%

-27.07%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.77%

-38.29%

-4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.66%

-10.87%

+5.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.12%

-11.86%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.05%

4.71%

+1.34%

Volatility

XMLD.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) is 9.09%, while iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIT.DE) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that XMLD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMLD.DEESIT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

10.53%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.01%

22.99%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.34%

27.95%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.56%

26.22%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.87%

25.56%

+2.31%

XMLD.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMLD.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIT.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMLD.DE vs. ESIT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMLD.DE nor ESIT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XMLD.DE and ESIT.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIT.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIT.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMLD.DE.

XMLD.DE tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence, while ESIT.DE tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMLD.DE and 0.18% for ESIT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMLD.DE and ESIT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer