PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMLD.DE vs. EMA5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMLD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMLD.DE achieves a 37.67% return, which is significantly higher than EMA5.DE's 5.40% return.


XMLD.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
1.86%
YTD
37.67%
6M
36.76%
1Y
64.71%
3Y*
33.11%
5Y*
16.22%
10Y*

EMA5.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
3.29%
YTD
5.40%
6M
5.74%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
7.00%
5Y*
4.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMLD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XMLD.DE
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
37.67%16.99%25.20%54.24%-36.43%19.04%1.94%
EMA5.DE
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
5.40%-2.08%14.60%4.24%-4.92%8.07%-0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XMLD.DE and EMA5.DE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMLD.DE vs. EMA5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMLD.DE
XMLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

EMA5.DE
EMA5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMLD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMLD.DEEMA5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.28

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

3.22

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.77

8.73

+2.05

XMLD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMLD.DE and EMA5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMLD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, which is greater than EMA5.DE's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLD.DE and EMA5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMLD.DEEMA5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.77%

-10.01%

-32.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.79%

-2.87%

-12.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.66%

-10.01%

-23.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.77%

-10.01%

-32.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.41%

0.00%

-5.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.19%

-3.35%

-9.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.99%

1.07%

+4.92%

Volatility

XMLD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE) at 2.54%. This indicates that XMLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMA5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMLD.DEEMA5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.00%

2.54%

+7.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.83%

4.80%

+16.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.32%

6.29%

+21.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.35%

7.12%

+20.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.80%

7.00%

+20.80%

XMLD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMLD.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EMA5.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMLD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Dividend Comparison

XMLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMA5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EMA5.DE
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
5.19%6.10%5.86%4.63%3.06%1.19%
XMLD.DE
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMLD.DE and EMA5.DE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMA5.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMA5.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMLD.DE.

XMLD.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while EMA5.DE is Emerging Markets Bonds. XMLD.DE tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence, while EMA5.DE tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMLD.DE and 0.25% for EMA5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMLD.DE and EMA5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer