XMLC.DE vs. LYM8.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMLC.DE (L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF) and LYM8.DE (Amundi MSCI Water ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist) are both Water Equities funds - XMLC.DE tracks the Solactive Clean Water while LYM8.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI Water ESG Filtered. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMLC.DE returned 6.47%/yr vs 5.71%/yr for LYM8.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMLC.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LYM8.DE.

Performance

XMLC.DE vs. LYM8.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) and Amundi MSCI Water ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM8.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMLC.DE achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than LYM8.DE's -0.12% return.

XMLC.DE

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 6.86%
• 3Y*: 8.21%
• 5Y*: 6.47%
• 10Y*: —

LYM8.DE

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -2.17%
• YTD: -0.12%
• 6M: -1.18%
• 1Y: -2.34%
• 3Y*: 6.96%
• 5Y*: 5.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMLC.DE vs. LYM8.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XMLC.DE L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF	2.11%	3.88%	9.96%	17.08%	-12.64%	37.15%	7.97%	11.56%
LYM8.DE Amundi MSCI Water ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist	-0.12%	2.13%	11.49%	18.92%	-17.25%	35.01%	6.62%	11.53%

Correlation

The correlation between XMLC.DE and LYM8.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019	0.89

The correlation between XMLC.DE and LYM8.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XMLC.DE vs. LYM8.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMLC.DE

XMLC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 16
XMLC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

LYM8.DE

LYM8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7
LYM8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
LYM8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
LYM8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7
LYM8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
LYM8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMLC.DE vs. LYM8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) and Amundi MSCI Water ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMLC.DE	LYM8.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	-0.19	+0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	-0.19	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.98	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.62	-0.23	+0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	-0.54	+2.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMLC.DE vs. LYM8.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the LYM8.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMLC.DE and LYM8.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMLC.DE	LYM8.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	-0.19	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.39	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.50	+0.06

Drawdowns

XMLC.DE vs. LYM8.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMLC.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.25%, roughly equal to the maximum LYM8.DE drawdown of -36.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLC.DE and LYM8.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMLC.DE	LYM8.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.25%	-36.55%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-10.22%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.51%	-16.93%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.54%	-24.56%	+4.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.57%	-9.06%	+1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.31%	-6.49%	+0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.28%	4.34%	-0.06%

Volatility

XMLC.DE vs. LYM8.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Amundi MSCI Water ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM8.DE) at 3.59%. This indicates that XMLC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYM8.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMLC.DE	LYM8.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	3.59%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.79%	9.33%	+1.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.11%	12.03%	+2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.51%	14.43%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.66%	16.06%	+2.60%

XMLC.DE vs. LYM8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMLC.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than LYM8.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMLC.DE vs. LYM8.DE - Dividend Comparison

XMLC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYM8.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LYM8.DE Amundi MSCI Water ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist	1.08%	1.08%	0.77%	0.85%	0.43%	0.62%	1.22%	1.49%	2.09%	1.61%
XMLC.DE L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMLC.DE and LYM8.DE in my portfolio?

XMLC.DE and LYM8.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMLC.DE or LYM8.DE?

On fees, XMLC.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMLC.DE or LYM8.DE?

XMLC.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LYM8.DE.

What is the main difference between XMLC.DE and LYM8.DE?

XMLC.DE tracks Solactive Clean Water, while LYM8.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Water ESG Filtered. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMLC.DE and 0.60% for LYM8.DE.