XMLC.DE vs. ETLK.DE
XMLC.DE (L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF) and ETLK.DE (L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMLC.DE is a Water Equities fund tracking the Solactive Clean Water, while ETLK.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Solactive Core Developed Markets Pacific ex Japan Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMLC.DE returned 6.47%/yr vs 5.51%/yr for ETLK.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMLC.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ETLK.DE.
Performance
XMLC.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMLC.DE achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than ETLK.DE's 8.76% return.
XMLC.DE
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ETLK.DE
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 14.03%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 5.51%
- 10Y*
- —
XMLC.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLC.DE L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF | 2.11% | 3.88% | 9.96% | 17.08% | -12.64% | 37.15% | 7.97% | 11.56% |
ETLK.DE L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 8.76% | 7.52% | 11.54% | 1.26% | -0.49% | 11.62% | -1.71% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLC.DE and ETLK.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XMLC.DE and ETLK.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMLC.DE vs. ETLK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMLC.DE
ETLK.DE
XMLC.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMLC.DE | ETLK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.21 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 2.34 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 6.47 | -4.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMLC.DE | ETLK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 1.16 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.37 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.39 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
XMLC.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLC.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.25%, roughly equal to the maximum ETLK.DE drawdown of -36.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLC.DE and ETLK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMLC.DE | ETLK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.25% | -36.72% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -5.98% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -19.89% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.54% | -19.89% | -0.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.57% | -2.56% | -5.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -5.76% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 2.16% | +2.12% |
Volatility
XMLC.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Volatility Comparison
L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLK.DE) at 3.38%. This indicates that XMLC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMLC.DE | ETLK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 3.38% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 9.32% | +1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.11% | 12.02% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 14.78% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 18.21% | +0.45% |
XMLC.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMLC.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLK.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMLC.DE vs. ETLK.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMLC.DE nor ETLK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMLC.DE and ETLK.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETLK.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLK.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMLC.DE.
XMLC.DE is categorized as Water Equities, while ETLK.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. XMLC.DE tracks Solactive Clean Water, while ETLK.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Pacific ex Japan Large & Mid Cap. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMLC.DE and 0.10% for ETLK.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMLC.DE and ETLK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer