XMLC.DE vs. ECLM.DE
XMLC.DE (L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF) and ECLM.DE (HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMLC.DE is a Water Equities fund tracking the Solactive Clean Water, while ECLM.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMLC.DE returned 6.47%/yr vs -0.34%/yr for ECLM.DE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMLC.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ECLM.DE.
Performance
XMLC.DE vs. ECLM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMLC.DE achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than ECLM.DE's 18.15% return.
XMLC.DE
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ECLM.DE
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 18.15%
- 6M
- 17.28%
- 1Y
- 37.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.34%
- 10Y*
- —
XMLC.DE vs. ECLM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLC.DE L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF | 2.11% | 3.88% | 9.96% | 17.08% | -12.64% | 37.15% | 1.76% |
ECLM.DE HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF | 18.15% | 12.83% | -11.47% | 1.02% | -23.37% | 14.89% | 7.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLC.DE and ECLM.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between XMLC.DE and ECLM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMLC.DE vs. ECLM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMLC.DE
ECLM.DE
XMLC.DE vs. ECLM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) and HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (ECLM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMLC.DE | ECLM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.32 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 1.87 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 3.63 | -2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMLC.DE | ECLM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 1.29 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | -0.01 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.10 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
XMLC.DE vs. ECLM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLC.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.25%, smaller than the maximum ECLM.DE drawdown of -49.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLC.DE and ECLM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMLC.DE | ECLM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.25% | -49.88% | +14.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -19.77% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -36.17% | +16.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.54% | -49.88% | +29.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.57% | -16.23% | +8.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -24.19% | +17.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 10.19% | -5.91% |
Volatility
XMLC.DE vs. ECLM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) is 4.03%, while HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (ECLM.DE) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that XMLC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECLM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMLC.DE | ECLM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 6.50% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 13.35% | -2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.11% | 28.64% | -14.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 23.04% | -7.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 23.35% | -4.69% |
XMLC.DE vs. ECLM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMLC.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ECLM.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMLC.DE vs. ECLM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMLC.DE nor ECLM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMLC.DE and ECLM.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMLC.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMLC.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ECLM.DE.
XMLC.DE is categorized as Water Equities, while ECLM.DE is Global Equities. XMLC.DE tracks Solactive Clean Water, while ECLM.DE tracks iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMLC.DE and 0.65% for ECLM.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMLC.DE and ECLM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer