PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMLC.DE vs. BATE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMLC.DE vs. BATE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) and Legal & General Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMLC.DE achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than BATE.DE's 34.62% return.


XMLC.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
2.11%
6M
1.67%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*

BATE.DE

1D
-2.05%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
34.62%
6M
40.82%
1Y
124.58%
3Y*
24.81%
5Y*
17.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMLC.DE vs. BATE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XMLC.DE
L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF
2.11%3.88%9.96%17.08%-12.64%37.15%7.97%11.56%
BATE.DE
Legal & General Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF
34.62%54.96%4.46%5.33%-9.13%25.95%63.33%12.12%

Correlation

The correlation between XMLC.DE and BATE.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019

0.66

The correlation between XMLC.DE and BATE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMLC.DE vs. BATE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMLC.DE
XMLC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMLC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMLC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XMLC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMLC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BATE.DE
BATE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BATE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BATE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMLC.DE vs. BATE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) and Legal & General Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMLC.DEBATE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.62

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

9.66

-9.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

32.63

-31.03

XMLC.DE vs. BATE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the BATE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMLC.DE and BATE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMLC.DEBATE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

4.23

-3.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.74

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.84

-0.27

Drawdowns

XMLC.DE vs. BATE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMLC.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.25%, roughly equal to the maximum BATE.DE drawdown of -36.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLC.DE and BATE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMLC.DEBATE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.25%

-36.39%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-12.82%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

-34.03%

+14.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.54%

-34.03%

+13.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.57%

-3.78%

-3.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-8.28%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

3.80%

+0.48%

Volatility

XMLC.DE vs. BATE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) is 4.03%, while Legal & General Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATE.DE) has a volatility of 10.54%. This indicates that XMLC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMLC.DEBATE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

10.54%

-6.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

22.97%

-12.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.11%

29.30%

-15.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

23.24%

-7.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

23.45%

-4.79%

XMLC.DE vs. BATE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XMLC.DE and BATE.DE have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

XMLC.DE vs. BATE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMLC.DE nor BATE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XMLC.DE and BATE.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMLC.DE and BATE.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

XMLC.DE is categorized as Water Equities, while BATE.DE is Alternative Energy Equities. XMLC.DE tracks Solactive Clean Water, while BATE.DE tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMLC.DE and BATE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer