PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMJP.L vs. XXTW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMJP.L vs. XXTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMJP.L is traded in GBp, while XXTW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XXTW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMJP.L achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly lower than XXTW.L's 24.48% return.


XMJP.L

1D
-0.26%
1M
6.26%
YTD
16.45%
6M
15.56%
1Y
34.15%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
10.26%

XXTW.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
15.15%
YTD
24.48%
6M
22.94%
1Y
53.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMJP.L vs. XXTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XMJP.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C
16.45%17.49%9.14%6.79%
XXTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF
24.48%13.82%36.21%14.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XMJP.L and XXTW.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMJP.L vs. XXTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMJP.L
XMJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XMJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XMJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

XXTW.L
XXTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMJP.L vs. XXTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMJP.LXXTW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.14

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

8.22

+2.00

XMJP.L vs. XXTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMJP.L and XXTW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMJP.LXXTW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.73

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.52

-1.12

Drawdowns

XMJP.L vs. XXTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMJP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.91%, roughly equal to the maximum XXTW.L drawdown of -28.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMJP.L and XXTW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMJP.LXXTW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.91%

-28.44%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.65%

-16.79%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-2.31%

+2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-5.02%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

6.43%

-3.10%

Volatility

XMJP.L vs. XXTW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) is 3.89%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that XMJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMJP.LXXTW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

6.76%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

14.37%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.08%

19.30%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

21.48%

-5.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.90%

21.48%

-5.58%

XMJP.L vs. XXTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMJP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XXTW.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XMJP.L vs. XXTW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMJP.L nor XXTW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XMJP.L and XXTW.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMJP.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMJP.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XXTW.L.

XMJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XXTW.L is Technology Equities. XMJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XMJP.L and 0.25% for XXTW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMJP.L and XXTW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer