XMJP.L vs. XSTC.L
XMJP.L (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XMJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMJP.L returned 10.23%/yr vs 24.21%/yr for XSTC.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMJP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSTC.L.
Performance
XMJP.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMJP.L achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 23.32% return.
XMJP.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 34.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 53.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.65%
- 5Y*
- 24.21%
- 10Y*
- —
XMJP.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMJP.L Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C | 16.45% | 17.49% | 9.14% | 13.88% | -7.09% | 2.11% | 12.34% | 14.37% | -6.62% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 23.32% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMJP.L and XSTC.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XMJP.L and XSTC.L has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XMJP.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMJP.L
XSTC.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Industrials
XMJP.L
XSTC.L
Technology
XMJP.L
XSTC.L
Financial Services
XMJP.L
XSTC.L
Consumer Cyclical
XMJP.L
XSTC.L
-
Communication Services
XMJP.L
XSTC.L
Healthcare
XMJP.L
XSTC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XMJP.L
XSTC.L
-
Basic Materials
XMJP.L
XSTC.L
-
Real Estate
XMJP.L
XSTC.L
-
Utilities
XMJP.L
XSTC.L
-
Energy
XMJP.L
XSTC.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMJP.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMJP.L
XSTC.L
XMJP.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMJP.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.44 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 3.04 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.22 | 7.79 | +2.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMJP.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.70 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 1.09 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 1.14 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
XMJP.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMJP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.91%, roughly equal to the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMJP.L and XSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMJP.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.91% | -29.30% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.65% | -17.49% | +6.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -29.30% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.48% | -29.30% | +10.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -2.71% | +2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.44% | -6.30% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 6.83% | -3.50% |
Volatility
XMJP.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) is 3.89%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that XMJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMJP.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.89% | 7.05% | -3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.76% | 14.45% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.08% | 19.63% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 22.22% | -6.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 22.43% | -6.53% |
XMJP.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMJP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMJP.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
XMJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMJP.L Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMJP.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XMJP.L.
XMJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XMJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XMJP.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.
Find the right allocation for XMJP.L and XSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer