PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XMJP.L vs. XDJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XMJP.L vs. XDJP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMJP.L (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C) and XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) are both Japan Equities funds from Xtrackers tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMJP.L returned 10.26%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for XDJP.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMJP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XDJP.L.

Performance

XMJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMJP.L achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly lower than XDJP.L's 31.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XMJP.L has underperformed XDJP.L with an annualized return of 10.26%, while XDJP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.

XMJP.L

1D
-0.26%
1M
6.26%
YTD
16.45%
6M
15.56%
1Y
34.15%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
10.26%

XDJP.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
10.95%
YTD
31.98%
6M
29.24%
1Y
64.30%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMJP.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C		16.45%17.49%9.14%13.88%-7.09%2.11%12.34%14.37%-8.64%13.19%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D		31.98%21.04%9.67%15.52%-10.26%-3.79%21.77%16.58%-3.53%14.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XMJP.L and XDJP.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2013

0.76

The correlation between XMJP.L and XDJP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XMJP.L
XDJP.L

Industrials

26.0%
19.4%

Technology

19.1%
31.9%

Financial Services

17.5%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
16.9%

Communication Services

7.9%
12.4%

Healthcare

6.3%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.3%

Basic Materials

3.0%
4.3%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.5%

Utilities

1.1%
0.2%

Energy

1.1%
0.3%

Industrials

XMJP.L
26.0%
XDJP.L
19.4%

Technology

XMJP.L
19.1%
XDJP.L
31.9%

Financial Services

XMJP.L
17.5%
XDJP.L
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XMJP.L
12.2%
XDJP.L
16.9%

Communication Services

XMJP.L
7.9%
XDJP.L
12.4%

Healthcare

XMJP.L
6.3%
XDJP.L
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

XMJP.L
3.6%
XDJP.L
3.3%

Basic Materials

XMJP.L
3.0%
XDJP.L
4.3%

Real Estate

XMJP.L
2.3%
XDJP.L
1.5%

Utilities

XMJP.L
1.1%
XDJP.L
0.2%

Energy

XMJP.L
1.1%
XDJP.L
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D

Often compared with XMJP.L:
XMJP.L vs. ISJP.LXMJP.L vs. JPJP.LXMJP.L vs. DXJG.LXMJP.L vs. DXJXMJP.L vs. DBJPXMJP.L vs. CSJP.LXMJP.L vs. SXR8.DE
Often compared with XDJP.L:
XDJP.L vs. CNKY.LXDJP.L vs. VJPN.LXDJP.L vs. DXJXDJP.L vs. DXJG.LXDJP.L vs. PRIJ.LXDJP.L vs. CSJP.LXDJP.L vs. JPJP.L

Return for Risk

XMJP.L vs. XDJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XMJP.L
XMJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XMJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XMJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XMJP.LXDJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.88
2.85

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.71
3.94

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.48

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

4.77

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

14.50

-4.28

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMJP.L and XDJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XMJP.LXDJP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.85

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.71

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.78

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.75

-0.35

Drawdowns

XMJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMJP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.91%, which is greater than XDJP.L's maximum drawdown of -23.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMJP.L and XDJP.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XMJP.LXDJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.91%

-23.69%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.65%

-13.40%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-18.82%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.48%

-20.61%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.22%

-23.69%

-0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-1.35%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-6.79%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

4.42%

-1.09%

Volatility

XMJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) is 3.89%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that XMJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XMJP.LXDJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

6.75%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

17.68%

-2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.08%

22.44%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

17.72%

-1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.90%

17.63%

-1.73%

XMJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMJP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XDJP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XMJP.L vs. XDJP.L - Dividend Comparison

XMJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D		1.04%1.33%1.41%1.59%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%
XMJP.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XMJP.L and XDJP.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XMJP.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XMJP.L and 0.09% for XDJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMJP.L and XDJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer