XMCX.L vs. XSTC.L
XMCX.L (Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XMCX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMCX.L returned -0.20%/yr vs 24.21%/yr for XSTC.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMCX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSTC.L.
Performance
XMCX.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMCX.L achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 23.32% return.
XMCX.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 53.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.65%
- 5Y*
- 24.21%
- 10Y*
- —
XMCX.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D | 3.83% | 8.84% | 3.42% | 3.42% | -20.92% | 14.63% | -8.73% | 24.38% | -12.35% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 23.32% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMCX.L and XSTC.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.46 |
XMCX.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMCX.L
XSTC.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Industrials
XMCX.L
XSTC.L
Financial Services
XMCX.L
XSTC.L
Consumer Cyclical
XMCX.L
XSTC.L
-
Technology
XMCX.L
XSTC.L
Real Estate
XMCX.L
XSTC.L
-
Basic Materials
XMCX.L
XSTC.L
-
Communication Services
XMCX.L
XSTC.L
Consumer Defensive
XMCX.L
XSTC.L
-
Healthcare
XMCX.L
XSTC.L
-
Utilities
XMCX.L
XSTC.L
-
Energy
XMCX.L
XSTC.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMCX.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMCX.L
XSTC.L
XMCX.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMCX.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.44 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 3.04 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | 7.79 | -5.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMCX.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 2.70 | -1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 1.09 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 1.14 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
XMCX.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -50.63%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMCX.L and XSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMCX.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.63% | -29.30% | -21.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.95% | -17.49% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | -29.30% | +10.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.61% | -29.30% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.13% | -2.71% | -4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -6.30% | -4.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 6.83% | -3.28% |
Volatility
XMCX.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) is 3.58%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that XMCX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMCX.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 7.05% | -3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 14.45% | -4.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 19.63% | -7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 22.22% | -7.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 22.43% | -5.96% |
XMCX.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMCX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMCX.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
XMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than XSTC.L's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMCX.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XMCX.L.
XMCX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XMCX.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.
Find the right allocation for XMCX.L and XSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer