XMCX.L vs. SX5S.L
XMCX.L (Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D) and SX5S.L (Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - XMCX.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP while SX5S.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMCX.L returned 2.36%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for SX5S.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMCX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SX5S.L.
Performance
XMCX.L vs. SX5S.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMCX.L achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than SX5S.L's 6.46% return. Over the past 10 years, XMCX.L has underperformed SX5S.L with an annualized return of 2.36%, while SX5S.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.
XMCX.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
SX5S.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 18.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
XMCX.L vs. SX5S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D | 3.83% | 8.84% | 3.42% | 3.42% | -20.92% | 14.63% | -8.73% | 24.38% | -16.43% | 14.26% |
SX5S.L Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 6.46% | 27.68% | 6.13% | 19.91% | -3.67% | 14.48% | 2.12% | 23.51% | -10.62% | 14.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMCX.L and SX5S.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2014 | 0.58 |
The correlation between XMCX.L and SX5S.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMCX.L vs. SX5S.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMCX.L
SX5S.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
XMCX.L
SX5S.L
Financial Services
XMCX.L
SX5S.L
Consumer Cyclical
XMCX.L
SX5S.L
Technology
XMCX.L
SX5S.L
Real Estate
XMCX.L
SX5S.L
-
Basic Materials
XMCX.L
SX5S.L
Communication Services
XMCX.L
SX5S.L
Consumer Defensive
XMCX.L
SX5S.L
Healthcare
XMCX.L
SX5S.L
Utilities
XMCX.L
SX5S.L
Energy
XMCX.L
SX5S.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMCX.L vs. SX5S.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMCX.L
SX5S.L
XMCX.L vs. SX5S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMCX.L | SX5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.23 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 1.62 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | 5.40 | -2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMCX.L | SX5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.23 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.69 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.73 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.59 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
XMCX.L vs. SX5S.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -50.63%, which is greater than SX5S.L's maximum drawdown of -32.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMCX.L and SX5S.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMCX.L | SX5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.63% | -32.54% | -18.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.95% | -11.43% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | -13.85% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.61% | -21.71% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.35% | -32.54% | -8.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.13% | -0.57% | -6.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -5.44% | -5.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 3.44% | +0.11% |
Volatility
XMCX.L vs. SX5S.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) is 3.58%, while Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that XMCX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SX5S.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMCX.L | SX5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 4.90% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 12.23% | -2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 15.09% | -2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 17.62% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 19.88% | -3.41% |
XMCX.L vs. SX5S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMCX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SX5S.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMCX.L vs. SX5S.L - Dividend Comparison
XMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while SX5S.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SX5S.L Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMCX.L and SX5S.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SX5S.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SX5S.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XMCX.L.
XMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while SX5S.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XMCX.L and 0.05% for SX5S.L.
Find the right allocation for XMCX.L and SX5S.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer