XMCX.L vs. MIBX.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XMCX.L (Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D) and MIBX.L (Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - XMCX.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP while MIBX.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMCX.L returned 7.21%/yr vs 17.49%/yr for MIBX.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMCX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MIBX.L.

Performance

XMCX.L vs. MIBX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMCX.L achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than MIBX.L's 17.04% return. Over the past 10 years, XMCX.L has underperformed MIBX.L with an annualized return of 7.21%, while MIBX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.49% annualized return.

XMCX.L

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: 4.74%
• 6M: 5.46%
• 1Y: 12.31%
• 3Y*: 12.34%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: 7.21%

MIBX.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 3.30%
• YTD: 17.04%
• 6M: 17.60%
• 1Y: 38.44%
• 3Y*: 29.72%
• 5Y*: 20.55%
• 10Y*: 17.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMCX.L vs. MIBX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D	4.74%	12.97%	7.76%	7.59%	-17.47%	16.28%	-5.13%	29.27%	-13.42%	17.78%
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist	17.04%	43.78%	13.17%	30.61%	-3.53%	18.16%	1.49%	25.15%	-12.72%	21.14%

Correlation

The correlation between XMCX.L and MIBX.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008	0.57

The correlation between XMCX.L and MIBX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMCX.L vs. MIBX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMCX.L	MIBX.L
Industrials	20.1%	11.4%
Financial Services	19.6%	45.3%
Consumer Cyclical	13.4%	9.9%
Technology	9.5%	5.5%
Real Estate	9.1%	0.3%
Basic Materials	6.7%	0.5%
Communication Services	6.0%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	0.4%
Healthcare	4.5%	1.2%
Utilities	3.1%	15.9%
Energy	2.6%	7.9%

Return for Risk

XMCX.L vs. MIBX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMCX.L

XMCX.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
XMCX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
XMCX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
XMCX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
XMCX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
XMCX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 28

MIBX.L

MIBX.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
MIBX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MIBX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
MIBX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
MIBX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MIBX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMCX.L vs. MIBX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMCX.L	MIBX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	2.54	-1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	3.41	-1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.44	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	3.73	-2.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.67	13.56	-9.89

XMCX.L vs. MIBX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMCX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the MIBX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMCX.L and MIBX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMCX.L vs. MIBX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -50.04%, smaller than the maximum MIBX.L drawdown of -67.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMCX.L and MIBX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMCX.L	MIBX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.04%	-67.93%	+17.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.95%	-10.26%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.34%	-15.64%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.77%	-24.06%	-5.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.35%	-35.10%	-6.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-2.69%	+1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.15%	-39.84%	+30.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	2.83%	+0.51%

Volatility

XMCX.L vs. MIBX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) is 3.34%, while Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that XMCX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIBX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMCX.L	MIBX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.34%	3.85%	-0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.28%	12.39%	-2.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.29%	15.10%	-2.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.96%	17.95%	-2.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.92%	18.93%	-3.01%

XMCX.L vs. MIBX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMCX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MIBX.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMCX.L vs. MIBX.L - Dividend Comparison

XMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than MIBX.L's 3.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist	3.15%	3.68%	3.93%	3.73%	3.88%	2.09%	1.55%	4.02%	4.05%	2.75%	3.56%	3.05%
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D	3.69%	3.61%	4.07%	3.17%	5.37%	1.37%	2.96%	3.44%	3.97%	2.80%	2.84%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMCX.L and MIBX.L in my portfolio?

XMCX.L and MIBX.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMCX.L or MIBX.L?

On fees, XMCX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMCX.L or MIBX.L?

XMCX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MIBX.L.

What is the main difference between XMCX.L and MIBX.L?

XMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while MIBX.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XMCX.L and 0.35% for MIBX.L.