PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMCX.L vs. JRDE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMCX.L vs. JRDE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) and JPMorgan Europe Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMCX.L achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than JRDE.L's 6.47% return.


XMCX.L

1D
0.64%
1M
3.42%
YTD
3.83%
6M
6.00%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
-0.20%
10Y*
2.36%

JRDE.L

1D
0.48%
1M
3.35%
YTD
6.47%
6M
8.47%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMCX.L vs. JRDE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XMCX.L
Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D
3.83%8.84%3.42%3.42%-20.92%-0.97%
JRDE.L
JPMorgan Europe Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist)
6.47%25.66%2.21%14.40%-3.79%4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XMCX.L and JRDE.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021

0.74

The correlation between XMCX.L and JRDE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMCX.L vs. JRDE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMCX.L
JRDE.L

Industrials

20.1%
20.4%

Financial Services

19.6%
23.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
6.6%

Technology

9.5%
8.7%

Real Estate

9.1%
0.1%

Basic Materials

6.7%
5.2%

Communication Services

6.0%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
7.3%

Healthcare

4.5%
13.3%

Utilities

3.1%
6.0%

Energy

2.6%
5.2%

Industrials

XMCX.L
20.1%
JRDE.L
20.4%

Financial Services

XMCX.L
19.6%
JRDE.L
23.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XMCX.L
13.4%
JRDE.L
6.6%

Technology

XMCX.L
9.5%
JRDE.L
8.7%

Real Estate

XMCX.L
9.1%
JRDE.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

XMCX.L
6.7%
JRDE.L
5.2%

Communication Services

XMCX.L
6.0%
JRDE.L
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

XMCX.L
5.5%
JRDE.L
7.3%

Healthcare

XMCX.L
4.5%
JRDE.L
13.3%

Utilities

XMCX.L
3.1%
JRDE.L
6.0%

Energy

XMCX.L
2.6%
JRDE.L
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMCX.L vs. JRDE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMCX.L
XMCX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XMCX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMCX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMCX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XMCX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMCX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

JRDE.L
JRDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
JRDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JRDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMCX.L vs. JRDE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) and JPMorgan Europe Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMCX.LJRDE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

1.73

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.78

6.00

-3.22

XMCX.L vs. JRDE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMCX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the JRDE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMCX.L and JRDE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMCX.LJRDE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.53

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.72

-0.50

Drawdowns

XMCX.L vs. JRDE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -50.63%, which is greater than JRDE.L's maximum drawdown of -15.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMCX.L and JRDE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMCX.LJRDE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.63%

-15.75%

-34.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.95%

-10.94%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-12.84%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.13%

-2.07%

-5.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.24%

-3.73%

-7.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

3.16%

+0.39%

Volatility

XMCX.L vs. JRDE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) is 3.58%, while JPMorgan Europe Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDE.L) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that XMCX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRDE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMCX.LJRDE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

3.98%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

10.29%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

12.39%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

14.16%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

14.16%

+2.31%

XMCX.L vs. JRDE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMCX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JRDE.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XMCX.L vs. JRDE.L - Dividend Comparison

XMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than JRDE.L's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRDE.L
JPMorgan Europe Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist)
2.19%2.18%2.68%1.11%2.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMCX.L
Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D
0.04%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.05%0.01%0.03%0.03%0.04%0.03%0.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMCX.L and JRDE.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMCX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMCX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JRDE.L.

XMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while JRDE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XMCX.L and 0.25% for JRDE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMCX.L and JRDE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer