XMCX.L vs. EUNY.DE
XMCX.L (Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D) and EUNY.DE (iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMCX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while EUNY.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Emerging Markets Select Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMCX.L returned 2.36%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for EUNY.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMCX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EUNY.DE.
Performance
XMCX.L vs. EUNY.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XMCX.L is traded in GBp, while EUNY.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUNY.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMCX.L achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than EUNY.DE's 10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, XMCX.L has underperformed EUNY.DE with an annualized return of 2.36%, while EUNY.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.18% annualized return.
XMCX.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
EUNY.DE
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 28.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
XMCX.L vs. EUNY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D | 3.83% | 8.84% | 3.42% | 3.42% | -20.92% | 14.63% | -8.73% | 24.38% | -16.43% | 14.26% |
EUNY.DE iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 10.59% | 19.90% | 7.49% | 13.07% | -22.09% | 11.52% | -6.72% | 12.15% | -0.16% | 15.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMCX.L and EUNY.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2012 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMCX.L vs. EUNY.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMCX.L
EUNY.DE
XMCX.L vs. EUNY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (EUNY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMCX.L | EUNY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.46 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 6.18 | -5.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | 16.25 | -13.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMCX.L | EUNY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 2.47 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.35 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.49 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.26 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
XMCX.L vs. EUNY.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -50.63%, which is greater than EUNY.DE's maximum drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMCX.L and EUNY.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMCX.L | EUNY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.63% | -43.69% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.95% | -4.66% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | -13.62% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.61% | -29.60% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.35% | -30.83% | -10.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.13% | -3.26% | -3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -12.32% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 1.77% | +1.78% |
Volatility
XMCX.L vs. EUNY.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) is 3.58%, while iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (EUNY.DE) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that XMCX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMCX.L | EUNY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 4.07% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 9.42% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 11.65% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 15.32% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 16.69% | -0.22% |
XMCX.L vs. EUNY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMCX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNY.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMCX.L vs. EUNY.DE - Dividend Comparison
XMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than EUNY.DE's 5.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNY.DE iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 5.32% | 5.82% | 7.72% | 8.04% | 9.56% | 6.35% | 5.09% | 5.57% | 5.65% | 4.09% | 4.35% | 6.37% |
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMCX.L and EUNY.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMCX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMCX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EUNY.DE.
XMCX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while EUNY.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. XMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while EUNY.DE tracks Dow Jones Emerging Markets Select Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XMCX.L and 0.65% for EUNY.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMCX.L and EUNY.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer