XMCX.L vs. ERNX.DE
XMCX.L (Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D) and ERNX.DE (iShares Euro Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - XMCX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while ERNX.DE is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Markit iBoxx EUR Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XMCX.L returned 6.25%/yr vs 3.49%/yr for ERNX.DE. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. XMCX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ERNX.DE.
Performance
XMCX.L vs. ERNX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XMCX.L is traded in GBp, while ERNX.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ERNX.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMCX.L achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly higher than ERNX.DE's 0.08% return.
XMCX.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
ERNX.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 4.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMCX.L vs. ERNX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D | 3.83% | 8.84% | 3.42% | 3.42% | -8.73% |
ERNX.DE iShares Euro Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating | 0.08% | 8.03% | -0.49% | 1.28% | 5.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMCX.L and ERNX.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2022 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMCX.L vs. ERNX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMCX.L
ERNX.DE
XMCX.L vs. ERNX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) and iShares Euro Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (ERNX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMCX.L | ERNX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 2.61 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | 5.65 | -2.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMCX.L | ERNX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.18 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.64 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
XMCX.L vs. ERNX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -50.63%, which is greater than ERNX.DE's maximum drawdown of -4.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMCX.L and ERNX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMCX.L | ERNX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.63% | -4.54% | -46.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.95% | -1.88% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | -3.07% | -15.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.13% | -0.90% | -6.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -1.42% | -9.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 0.87% | +2.68% |
Volatility
XMCX.L vs. ERNX.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to iShares Euro Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (ERNX.DE) at 1.03%. This indicates that XMCX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMCX.L | ERNX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 1.03% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 2.79% | +7.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 4.18% | +8.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 5.36% | +9.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 5.36% | +11.11% |
XMCX.L vs. ERNX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMCX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNX.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMCX.L vs. ERNX.DE - Dividend Comparison
XMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while ERNX.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERNX.DE iShares Euro Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMCX.L and ERNX.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ERNX.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ERNX.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XMCX.L.
XMCX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ERNX.DE is Ultrashort Bond. XMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while ERNX.DE tracks Markit iBoxx EUR Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XMCX.L and 0.09% for ERNX.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMCX.L and ERNX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer