PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMCX.L vs. ARE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMCX.L vs. ARE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) and Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMCX.L is traded in GBp, while ARE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMCX.L achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than ARE's 10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XMCX.L has outperformed ARE with an annualized return of 2.36%, while ARE has yielded a comparatively lower -1.63% annualized return.


XMCX.L

1D
0.64%
1M
3.42%
YTD
3.83%
6M
6.00%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
-0.20%
10Y*
2.36%

ARE

1D
3.61%
1M
22.39%
YTD
10.70%
6M
16.71%
1Y
-18.95%
3Y*
-20.67%
5Y*
-17.70%
10Y*
-1.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMCX.L vs. ARE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMCX.L
Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D
3.83%8.84%3.42%3.42%-20.92%14.63%-8.73%24.38%-16.43%14.26%
ARE
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
10.70%-50.40%-18.03%-13.65%-24.61%29.30%9.95%38.56%-3.58%10.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XMCX.L and ARE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007

0.21

The correlation between XMCX.L and ARE shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (10 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMCX.L vs. ARE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMCX.L
XMCX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XMCX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMCX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMCX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XMCX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMCX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ARE
ARE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ARE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ARE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMCX.L vs. ARE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) and Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMCX.LAREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.95

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

-0.37

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.78

-0.60

+3.38

XMCX.L vs. ARE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMCX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the ARE Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMCX.L and ARE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMCX.LAREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

-0.45

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.56

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

-0.06

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.07

+0.15

Drawdowns

XMCX.L vs. ARE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -50.63%, smaller than the maximum ARE drawdown of -78.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMCX.L and ARE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMCX.LAREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.63%

-78.04%

+27.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.95%

-51.68%

+39.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-67.68%

+49.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.61%

-78.04%

+45.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.35%

-78.04%

+36.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.13%

-70.80%

+63.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.24%

-20.61%

+9.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

31.47%

-27.92%

Volatility

XMCX.L vs. ARE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) is 3.58%, while Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) has a volatility of 12.01%. This indicates that XMCX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMCX.LAREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

12.01%

-8.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

32.36%

-22.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

42.67%

-30.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

31.84%

-16.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

29.04%

-12.57%

Dividends

XMCX.L vs. ARE - Dividend Comparison

XMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than ARE's 7.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARE
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
7.68%9.56%5.32%3.91%3.24%2.01%2.38%2.48%3.24%2.64%2.91%3.38%
XMCX.L
Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D
0.04%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.05%0.01%0.03%0.03%0.04%0.03%0.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMCX.L and ARE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMCX.L and ARE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer