XMAW.DE vs. VWRL.AS
XMAW.DE (Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and VWRL.AS (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing) are both Global Equities funds - XMAW.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while VWRL.AS tracks the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMAW.DE returned 12.33%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for VWRL.AS. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XMAW.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for VWRL.AS.
Performance
XMAW.DE vs. VWRL.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XMAW.DE having a 12.49% return and VWRL.AS slightly higher at 12.89%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XMAW.DE having a 12.33% annualized return and VWRL.AS not far ahead at 12.39%.
XMAW.DE
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 12.49%
- 6M
- 12.66%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
VWRL.AS
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 12.89%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 26.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
XMAW.DE vs. VWRL.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMAW.DE Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 12.49% | 8.98% | 25.39% | 19.46% | -15.01% | 28.71% | 5.50% | 30.15% | -6.20% | 9.14% |
VWRL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing | 12.89% | 8.40% | 25.57% | 18.07% | -13.65% | 28.52% | 6.31% | 27.76% | -4.68% | 8.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMAW.DE and VWRL.AS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014 | 0.96 |
The correlation between XMAW.DE and VWRL.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMAW.DE vs. VWRL.AS — Risk / Return Rank
XMAW.DE
VWRL.AS
XMAW.DE vs. VWRL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.DE) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (VWRL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMAW.DE | VWRL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.44 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 4.00 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.79 | 16.48 | -1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMAW.DE | VWRL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 2.34 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.88 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.82 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
XMAW.DE vs. VWRL.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMAW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.49%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRL.AS drawdown of -33.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAW.DE and VWRL.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMAW.DE | VWRL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.49% | -33.27% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | -6.53% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.10% | -21.00% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.10% | -21.00% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.49% | -33.27% | -0.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.61% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -4.38% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 1.59% | +0.23% |
Volatility
XMAW.DE vs. VWRL.AS - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.DE) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (VWRL.AS) have volatilities of 3.16% and 3.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMAW.DE | VWRL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 3.07% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.70% | 8.03% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 11.16% | +0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 13.70% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 14.82% | +0.41% |
XMAW.DE vs. VWRL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMAW.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRL.AS's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMAW.DE vs. VWRL.AS - Dividend Comparison
XMAW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRL.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing | 1.24% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.74% | 2.10% | 1.43% | 1.56% | 1.89% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 1.95% | 2.03% |
XMAW.DE Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, XMAW.DE and VWRL.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VWRL.AS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VWRL.AS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XMAW.DE.
XMAW.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VWRL.AS tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XMAW.DE and 0.19% for VWRL.AS.
Find the right allocation for XMAW.DE and VWRL.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer