PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMAG vs. MSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMAG vs. MSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAG achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly higher than MSTX's -54.94% return.


XMAG

1D
0.01%
1M
6.69%
YTD
12.73%
6M
13.28%
1Y
24.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTX

1D
-14.41%
1M
-56.02%
YTD
-54.94%
6M
-72.02%
1Y
-95.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMAG vs. MSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
12.73%15.63%-1.67%
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
-54.94%-89.06%9.35%

Correlation

The correlation between XMAG and MSTX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMAG vs. MSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAG
XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTX
MSTX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAG vs. MSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMAGMSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.78

+0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

-0.99

+4.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.15

-1.27

+16.42

XMAG vs. MSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMAG Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the MSTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMAG and MSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMAGMSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

-0.68

+2.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

-0.42

+1.53

Drawdowns

XMAG vs. MSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAG drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum MSTX drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAG and MSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMAGMSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-98.66%

+82.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-96.62%

+89.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-98.61%

+98.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.13%

-69.94%

+67.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

75.26%

-73.63%

Volatility

XMAG vs. MSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) is 2.87%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) has a volatility of 39.64%. This indicates that XMAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMAGMSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

39.64%

-36.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

112.57%

-103.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.10%

140.09%

-128.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

167.46%

-152.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

167.46%

-152.34%

XMAG vs. MSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMAG vs. MSTX - Dividend Comparison

XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while MSTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%41.01%
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
0.46%0.51%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMAG and MSTX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTX has higher volatility (39.64%) compared to XMAG (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMAG dropped -16.17% vs MSTX's -98.66%.

On 1-year performance, XMAG leads with 24.62% vs -95.49% for MSTX. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMAG has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XMAG has performed better with a 24.62% return vs -95.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for MSTX.

XMAG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for MSTX.

XMAG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MSTX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMAG and 1.29% for MSTX.

XMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMAG and MSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer