PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMAG vs. MSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMAG vs. MSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAG achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly higher than MSTX's -78.16% return.


XMAG

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.67%
6M
9.96%
YTD
12.34%
1Y
20.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTX

1D
-7.17%
1M
-46.60%
6M
-82.11%
YTD
-78.16%
1Y
-98.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMAG vs. MSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
12.34%15.63%-1.52%
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
-78.16%-89.06%9.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XMAG and MSTX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMAG vs. MSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAG
XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTX
MSTX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAG vs. MSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMAGMSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.72

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

-1.00

+3.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.02

-1.20

+13.22

XMAG vs. MSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the MSTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMAG and MSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMAG vs. MSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAG drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum MSTX drawdown of -99.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAG and MSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMAGMSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-99.46%

+83.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-98.60%

+91.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-99.33%

+96.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-71.56%

+69.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

82.20%

-80.51%

Volatility

XMAG vs. MSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) is 3.47%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) has a volatility of 51.75%. This indicates that XMAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMAGMSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

51.75%

-48.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

121.25%

-111.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

148.20%

-136.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

167.92%

-152.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.08%

167.92%

-152.84%

XMAG vs. MSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMAG vs. MSTX - Dividend Comparison

XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while MSTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%41.01%
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
0.46%0.51%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMAG and MSTX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTX has higher volatility (51.75%) compared to XMAG (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMAG dropped -16.17% vs MSTX's -99.46%.

On 1-year performance, XMAG leads with 20.23% vs -98.30% for MSTX. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XMAG has performed better with a 20.23% return vs -98.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for MSTX.

XMAG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for MSTX.

XMAG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MSTX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMAG and 1.29% for MSTX.

XMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMAG and MSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer