XMAG vs. IWMY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index, while IWMY is a Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XMAG returned 24.62% vs 23.33% for IWMY. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMAG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IWMY.

Performance

XMAG vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XMAG having a 12.73% return and IWMY slightly lower at 12.25%.

XMAG

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 12.73%
• 6M: 13.28%
• 1Y: 24.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWMY

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 12.25%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 23.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMAG vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	12.73%	15.63%	-1.67%
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	12.25%	10.18%	-2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XMAG and IWMY is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024	0.82

The correlation between XMAG and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XMAG vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAG

XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 68
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

IWMY

IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 40
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAG vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMAG	IWMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	1.49	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	2.02	+1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.26	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	2.03	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.15	6.66	+8.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMAG vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMAG Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMAG and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMAG	IWMY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	1.49	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	0.95	+0.16

Drawdowns

XMAG vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAG drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum IWMY drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAG and IWMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMAG	IWMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.17%	-18.72%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.29%	-11.57%	+4.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.36%	+1.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-2.98%	+0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	3.51%	-1.88%

Volatility

XMAG vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) is 2.87%, while Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that XMAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMAG	IWMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	5.42%	-2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.65%	12.62%	-3.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.10%	15.69%	-4.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.12%	15.75%	-0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.12%	15.75%	-0.63%

XMAG vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMAG vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than IWMY's 45.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	45.96%	63.33%	107.92%	11.34%
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	0.46%	0.51%	0.24%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMAG and IWMY in my portfolio?

XMAG and IWMY have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMAG or IWMY?

IWMY has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to XMAG (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMAG dropped -16.17% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

Which ETF is better, XMAG or IWMY?

On 1-year performance, XMAG leads with 24.62% vs 23.33% for IWMY. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMAG has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMAG or IWMY?

Over the 1-year period, XMAG has performed better with a 24.62% return vs 23.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMAG or IWMY?

XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMAG or IWMY?

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 45.96%, compared with 0.46% for XMAG.

What is the main difference between XMAG and IWMY?

XMAG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IWMY is Options Trading. XMAG tracks BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index, while IWMY tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMAG and 0.99% for IWMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.